2012
DOI: 10.1057/iga.2012.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The determinants of direct corporate lobbying in the EU: A multi-dimensional proxy of corporate lobbying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding furnishes theoretical support to a similar empirical finding by Vannoni (2013). Specifically, Vannoni (2013) uncovers a negative and statistically significant (at the 1% level) relationship between industry concentration and "direct lobbying" by the industry -for firms in the European Union.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This finding furnishes theoretical support to a similar empirical finding by Vannoni (2013). Specifically, Vannoni (2013) uncovers a negative and statistically significant (at the 1% level) relationship between industry concentration and "direct lobbying" by the industry -for firms in the European Union.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…We also analyze the impact of the economic sector on the level of access. Vannoni (2012) hypothesized that the different weight of economic sectors in direct lobbying due to the Olsonian argument attributes access to industry concentration. In a different way, in this research, we suggest that the participation of various sectors is related to policy agenda setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the power asymmetries and value differences that exist within the international networks create limits for transnational cooperation among organized interest groups (Rohrschneider and Dalton 2002, p. 510). This evolution may be perceived as a strategy of conscious adaptation to the dynamics of EU institutions' "interest overload" or as a normal reaction to the current phase of interest group population (Vannoni 2013). Other findings indicate that the differences between OI approaches can be, to some extent, attributed to the organizational character or policy area.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%