1989
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(89)90018-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The detection of slow stimulus movement in 2- to 5-month-olds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
35
2
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, newborn infants are sensitive to velocity when it concerns the information-based control of head movements. In contrast, studies assessing infant perception, which commonly use habituation or preference looking methods, found no sign that infants younger than 2 months of age perceive velocity (e.g., Dannemiller & Freedland, 1989Wattam-Bell, 1990). This discrepancy between action and perception in the use of velocity information suggests that vision for action and vision for perception develop independently.…”
Section: Action and Perception In Infancymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…That is, newborn infants are sensitive to velocity when it concerns the information-based control of head movements. In contrast, studies assessing infant perception, which commonly use habituation or preference looking methods, found no sign that infants younger than 2 months of age perceive velocity (e.g., Dannemiller & Freedland, 1989Wattam-Bell, 1990). This discrepancy between action and perception in the use of velocity information suggests that vision for action and vision for perception develop independently.…”
Section: Action and Perception In Infancymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In the case of an autonomous change (excluding cyclic movements such as those associated with a bouncing ball), Premack suggests that infants perceive intentionality and show preference toward these objects. While adults can identify the nature of a self-propelled object and associate intentionality to it, for infants what matters is not the object but the type of movements it generates (Sekuler 1975) and its velocity (Aslin and Shea 1990;Dannemiller and Freeland 1989). A child is also able to attribute self-propelled capabilities once having seen the robot intentionally moving, and this association will continue even when the robot has stopped (Premack 1990).…”
Section: Mobile Robots and Autismmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Children can pursue moving visual stimuli already by the age of 4 weeks, provided that the stimulus speed does not exceed 20°/s. At the age of 4 months children can reliably differentiate between stimulus movement and self-movement (Dannemiller and Friedland 1989 ). Interestingly children at this age can detect moving (and fl ickering) stimuli more reliably than stationary ones, and show more reliable orienting responses to moving stimuli (Wattam-Bell 1992, 1996a.…”
Section: Smooth Pursuit Eye Movementsmentioning
confidence: 96%