2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-45016-8_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Detection of Dynamical Organization in Cancer Evolution Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can therefore use the same framework for both situations. Indeed, we analyzed several systems with strong dynamical organization, by juxtaposing the states belonging to different asymptotic behaviors of the same system (different attractors of a genetic regulatory network [ 20 , 31 , 32 ] and patients affected by the same kind of disease [ 33 ]) or by observing the trajectory of a single system (a socio-economic system [ 34 ]), sometimes perturbing it (metabolic networks [ 24 ] and autocatalytic systems [ 19 , 35 ]). The performed RI analyses show some common characteristics, so in this paper we choose to expose them by commenting in detail a particular system: an autocatalytic reaction network introduced in [ 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can therefore use the same framework for both situations. Indeed, we analyzed several systems with strong dynamical organization, by juxtaposing the states belonging to different asymptotic behaviors of the same system (different attractors of a genetic regulatory network [ 20 , 31 , 32 ] and patients affected by the same kind of disease [ 33 ]) or by observing the trajectory of a single system (a socio-economic system [ 34 ]), sometimes perturbing it (metabolic networks [ 24 ] and autocatalytic systems [ 19 , 35 ]). The performed RI analyses show some common characteristics, so in this paper we choose to expose them by commenting in detail a particular system: an autocatalytic reaction network introduced in [ 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we presented a methodology for the identification of mesolevel objects, which we call relevant subsets, based on entropic measures, which may involve dynamical aspects [ 19 , 24 , 27 , 34 ] or juxtapose different realizations within a population of individuals sharing the same common organization [ 20 , 31 , 33 ]. We identified an entropic measure useful for the detection of relevant subsets and studied its theoretical distribution, a fact that helps in the interpretation of the results and allows to avoid the excessively onerous bootstrap calculations from a homogeneous system that are needed to compare groups of different size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we utilize the index called zI (see below), which makes it possible to identify, as components of a system, sets of variables that show a high degree of internal coordination. The RI methodology has been applied with interesting results to several systems: some of them had been artificially designed in order to test the effectiveness of the technique, while others referred to interesting physical, chemical, biological, or socio-economic systems [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: The Relevance Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods to explore the dynamical organization of complex systems can be proposed. In this paper, we make use of one such method, which was introduced by us some years ago [10,11] and which has later been improved [12] and applied to different classes of systems [13][14][15][16]. The method identifies integrated groups of variables, by means of measures based upon information theory (the Relevance Index methodology-RI in the following), which is briefly recalled in Section 2.1 (referring the interested reader to the literature [12] for further details).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to identify the Relevant Sets, we have developed the Relevance Index (RI) method [13][14][15], which is used to evaluate, for each subset of variables, how well they satisfy conditions (i) and (ii) above. Inspired by work by Tononi and Edelman [8,16,17], it makes use of some information-theoretical measures, which can be computed from the observations of the values of the system variables in different circumstances (which often, but not necessarily, correspond to different observation times) [15,[18][19][20]. By directly applying the RI method to various subsets and by ranking them according to their RI evaluations, one finds overlapping sets with similar values of the index, a condition which makes it very difficult to identify what the RSs really are.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%