1965
DOI: 10.1109/proc.1965.4477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The detection of daytime nuclear bursts below 150 km by prompt VLF phase anomalies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This departure from the ideal model can be partially explained by the fact that the reflection height for 1-10 kHz waves changes slightly with frequency. Analysis of the frequency-dependent reflection height is nontrivial and was investigated extensively in the 1960s and 1970s [Field and Engel, 1965;Bannister, 1979]. We note that some more contemporary published approaches like that of Ohya et al [2003], who ignore the high collision frequency in the D region, are not accurate in the ELF/VLF bands.…”
Section: Frequency Shift and Variability Of Resonance Peaksmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This departure from the ideal model can be partially explained by the fact that the reflection height for 1-10 kHz waves changes slightly with frequency. Analysis of the frequency-dependent reflection height is nontrivial and was investigated extensively in the 1960s and 1970s [Field and Engel, 1965;Bannister, 1979]. We note that some more contemporary published approaches like that of Ohya et al [2003], who ignore the high collision frequency in the D region, are not accurate in the ELF/VLF bands.…”
Section: Frequency Shift and Variability Of Resonance Peaksmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We note that some more contemporary published approaches like that of Ohya et al [], who ignore the high collision frequency in the D region, are not accurate in the ELF/VLF bands. Using the formulations provided by Field and Engel [] and Bannister [], the physical reflection height occurs where the conduction current is equal to the displacement current or at an altitude z where ω=ωp2(z)ν(z)cos(θi) …”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Localized ionospheric disturbances can also disrupt VLF propagation and electrons from the magnetosphere, dumped into the ionosphere by wave-particle interactions involving whistlers, have been found to affect VLF propagation [Helliwell et al, 1973;Lohrey and Kaiser, 1979]. Man-made localized ionospheric disturbances have also been produced, and in the early 1960's, much theoretical and experimental work was undertaken on the effects of atmospheric nuclear explosions both directly on and adjacent to VLF propagation paths [Wait, 1961[Wait, , 1964aCrombie, 1964;Jean and Crombie, 1963;Field and Engel, 1965].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data in this section were obtained using a disturbed ionosphere which simulated the effect of a low yield nuclear burst at 40 km. The profile for the ionospheric perturbation was obtained from the paper by Field and Engel [1965].…”
Section: Effect Of a Small Nuclear Weapon Perturbation On Radio Propamentioning
confidence: 99%