1996
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(95)00242-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The detection and evaluation of aneugenic chemicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
1
11

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
18
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding that HU was positive in the TK mutation assay but negative in the MN test is unusual in light of the fact that the MN test is more effective for detecting clastogens because it detects genotoxins regardless of whether they interact with DNA [Parry et al, 1996]. The explanation may relate to the protocol.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Our finding that HU was positive in the TK mutation assay but negative in the MN test is unusual in light of the fact that the MN test is more effective for detecting clastogens because it detects genotoxins regardless of whether they interact with DNA [Parry et al, 1996]. The explanation may relate to the protocol.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…et al, 1995). The development of appropriate methods for the detection and assessment of aneugenic chemicals has been a major thrust of a number of research programmes of the European Union (reviewed by Parry and Sors, 1993;Parry et al, 1996). These projects have progressed since that time to develop and to apply a range of methodologies capable of detecting and assessing the significance of aneugenic activity to both somatic and germ cells by the use of both in vitro and in vivo tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little further insight into quantifying the portion of micronuclei caused by failure of the mitotic spindle can be gained using in situ hybridization with whole centromere DNA probes in cytochalasin-induced binucleated cells. Improvements in the micronucleus assay in vitro, particularly a method for chromosome painting in micronuclei, developed more recently are expected to elucidate the interrelationship between micronucleus formation and mutagenesis and to evaluate the relative hazards of low dose response to aneugenic chemicals (Parry et al, 1996). This will lead to a better understanding and interpretation of results obtained by examination of in vivo exposed humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%