The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.2749/101686613x13627347100194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Design Value Method and Adjusted Partial Factor Approach for Existing Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the factor a R significantly affects the partial factor c Rd [44]. Further information on derivation of the partial factors in the semi-probabilistic framework can be found elsewhere [6,49]. Note that the model uncertainty factors are here differentiated with respect to the shear strength q w f yw only as the previous studies indicated less significant effect of other shear parameters (such as d or q l ) on the model uncertainty.…”
Section: For Deterministic Reliability Verifications En 1990mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Note that the factor a R significantly affects the partial factor c Rd [44]. Further information on derivation of the partial factors in the semi-probabilistic framework can be found elsewhere [6,49]. Note that the model uncertainty factors are here differentiated with respect to the shear strength q w f yw only as the previous studies indicated less significant effect of other shear parameters (such as d or q l ) on the model uncertainty.…”
Section: For Deterministic Reliability Verifications En 1990mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(2). The semi-probabilistic (Level I) method according to EN 1990:2002 (for details see [8]) leads to a partial factor for lognormal X i with a unit characteristic value:…”
Section: Deterioration Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the limited amount of data, the following recommendations are provided on the basis of the results given in Table 2: -Model uncertainty characteristics µ θ ≈ 1.2 and V θ ≈ 0.15 should be considered when compressive strength is decisive in Equation (2), -µ θ ≈ 1.25 and V θ ≈ 0.15 should be considered when tensile strength is governing resistance of a cast-iron column. These characteristics can be directly applied when deriving model uncertainty factor for assessments using the partial factor method as provided in EN 1990:2002 for basis of structural design [16,17]. Figure 4 shows variation of model uncertainty values with slenderness ratio for solid cylindrical columns.…”
Section: Statistical Evaluation Of Model Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%