2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scaffolds with hexagonal-shaped pores demonstrated angiogenesis at a significantly slower rate than the scaffolds with gyroid-shaped pores [ 20 ]. This finding is consistent with more recent studies, which showed enhanced HUVEC migration and tube formation in gyroid scaffolds compared to cubic and cylindrical pore scaffolds [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scaffolds with hexagonal-shaped pores demonstrated angiogenesis at a significantly slower rate than the scaffolds with gyroid-shaped pores [ 20 ]. This finding is consistent with more recent studies, which showed enhanced HUVEC migration and tube formation in gyroid scaffolds compared to cubic and cylindrical pore scaffolds [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Corroborating these results, several studies have reported the angiogenic properties of the gyroid structure, noting that pore size and interconnectivity have essential roles in blood vessels [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Scaffolds with a 200–400 μm pore diameter demonstrated the formation of a large blood vascular network of vessels with deep penetration depth [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Furthermore, there is evidence that cubic scaffolds enable better cell survival, possibly due to the 3D mesh structure that allows nutrients, oxygen, and metabolites to circulate more easily inside the scaffold [46,69,97]. This 3D structure also provides a larger contact area that is more conducive to cell attachment, proliferation, and migration [50,98].…”
Section: Scaffold Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scaffolds exhibited strong mechanical strength and non-cytotoxicity. Li et al [117] prepared Mg/Sr co-doped silicate bioceramic (MS-CSi) scaffolds with three different pore geometries (gyroid, cylindrical, and cubic shapes) and compared their effects on osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo.…”
Section: Bioceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%