“…In designing these antagonists the importance of the following structural features were considered: (i) the neutralization of the amine terminus by acetylation enhanced activity ∼10-fold, (ii) the preference for d -aromatic amino acids in the 16 position, (iii) the requirement for a tryptophan of the l -stereochemistry in the C-terminal 21 position, and (iv) the necessity of a C-terminal carboxylate. − These observations resulted in the design and preparation of Ac- d Dip 16 -Leu-Asp-Ile-Ile-Trp 21 [compound 2 , PD 142893 (Dip = 3,3-diphenylalanine)] ,− and Ac- d Bhg 16 -Leu-Asp-Ile-Ile-Trp 21 [PD 145065, compound 3 (Bhg = 10,11-dihydro-5 H -dibenzo[ a,d ]cycloheptene-glycine)]. − Both of these compounds exhibited low-nanomolar affinity for the ET A (58 and 4.0 nM, respectively) and ET B (130 and 30 nM, respectively) receptors. Likewise, compounds 2 and 3 were able to antagonize ET-1-stimulated vasoconstriction in vitro in the rabbit femoral artery (ET A , p A 2 = 6.6 and 6.8, respectively) and SRTX-6c-stimulated vasoconstriction in the rabbit pulmonary artery (ET B , p A 2 = 6.3 and 7.0, respectively). ,− Unfortunately, both of these compounds have relatively short half-lives (18.1 ± 3.4 and 10.6 ± 2.2 min, respectively) in rat intestinal perfusate, suggesting limited utility of these compounds for further in vivo evaluation. , …”