2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2016.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The design of particle swarm optimization guidance using a line-of-sight evaluation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, classical guidance theory and advanced guidance theory require specific formulas to calculate guidance commands, while intelligent algorithms do not require specific guidance command calculation formulas. Heuristic intelligent algorithms such as genetic algorithm [12], ant colony [13][14][15] algorithm, and particle swarm optimization (PSO) [16][17][18][19] algorithm have been utilized to calculate the guidance commands, which further improve the performance of both traditional and modern guidance laws.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, classical guidance theory and advanced guidance theory require specific formulas to calculate guidance commands, while intelligent algorithms do not require specific guidance command calculation formulas. Heuristic intelligent algorithms such as genetic algorithm [12], ant colony [13][14][15] algorithm, and particle swarm optimization (PSO) [16][17][18][19] algorithm have been utilized to calculate the guidance commands, which further improve the performance of both traditional and modern guidance laws.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particle swarm optimization guidance (PSOG) method for the nonlinear and dynamic pursuit-evasion optimization problem is designed in [16], and the relative distance is taken to be objective function, which is solved by PSO algorithm. The improved particle swarm optimization guidance (IPSOG) is proposed in [17], and the objective function is changed from relative distance to line-of-sight rate, and the proposed IPSOG algorithm reduces the acceleration requirements of missile compared with PSOG. In [18], a combined PN-IPSOG guidance algorithm is presented, and PN guidance is adopted in the initial stage and then transferred to IPSOG, which can solve the shortcoming of IPSOG that the overload changes greatly in the initial stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential game guidance regards the target as an intelligent agent in which the target executes the best maneuver strategy to avoid interception [6]. Moreover, heuristic algorithms such as genetic algorithms, ant colony algorithm, and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] have been utilized to calculate the guidance commands, which further improve the performance of both traditional and modern guidance laws.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the lack of the guidance subsystem, the control lag caused by the large inertia of UAV cannot be solved. Line of sight (LOS) guidance is the most widely used among guidance methods due to its simplicity and ease of implementation and many control strategies combined with LOS has been proposed to meet various practical needs, including unmanned surface vehicle (Jiang et al, 2020; Liu et al, 2015; Rout et al, 2020; Woo et al, 2019) underwater vehicles (Sahu and Subudhi, 2017; Wang et al, 2020) and unmanned aerial vehicle (Chen et al, 2016; Chen et al, 2019; He et al, 2017; Hu et al, 2020; Wang et al, 2019; Zheng and Zou, 2016; Zuo et al, 2019), these LOS-based control strategies can compensate for control lag, but the optimized indicators are generally designed as the shortest settling time and the minimum path deviation, which inevitably leads to overshoot of the following path. This paper therefore introduces a novel guidance and control system based on the IPSO algorithm, the LOS guidance law and the PI controller, which can meet the needs of fast non-overshoot control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%