2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.08.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The design of advanced performance high strength low-carbon martensitic armour steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…X-ray diffraction in an X'Pert PRO PANalytical equipment was used to determine the phases present (particularly the % retained austenite) in the steels and their lattice parameters. The results of the above analyses were finally correlated to the ballistic performances reported in [6,21].…”
Section: Steelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…X-ray diffraction in an X'Pert PRO PANalytical equipment was used to determine the phases present (particularly the % retained austenite) in the steels and their lattice parameters. The results of the above analyses were finally correlated to the ballistic performances reported in [6,21].…”
Section: Steelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…three commercial armour steels were reported in [6,21]. Table 5 extracted from the ballistic report [6] is quoted here.…”
Section: Ballistic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hardness is an indicator of tensile strength and as extensive analytical work [2][3][4][5] relies almost entirely on the tensile strength of the material, the use of material hardness as a ballistic performance indicator is entirely valid in certain cases. Recent work [6] indicates, however that material hardness alone might not be the only required mechanical property for optimal ballistic performance. The development of Dual-Phase, TRIP and especially TWIP alloys [7] (with tensile strength of ≈1700MPa at 45% strain), indicates that enhanced plastic energy absorption could be attained with higher work-hardening rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%