1990
DOI: 10.1109/12.48874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The design of a testable parallel multiplier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference [1] uses 6 extra pins and 16 patterns getting 100 percent test coverage, while [2] uses 7 extra pins and 8 test patterns. Reference [3] modifies the multiplier and use only 1 extra pin, but it gets a linear-testable module. All these need to change the design, and it may introduce performance issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [1] uses 6 extra pins and 16 patterns getting 100 percent test coverage, while [2] uses 7 extra pins and 8 test patterns. Reference [3] modifies the multiplier and use only 1 extra pin, but it gets a linear-testable module. All these need to change the design, and it may introduce performance issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of testing one-dimensional and two-dimensional arrays for single faults has been studied extensively 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] with considerable attention on arithmetic circuits. Researchers have modi ed the array multiplier to make it C-testable 2], that is, testable with a constant number of tests independent of the size of the array multiplier 9, 7,10]. Under the single faulty cell model it is assumed that at most one cell is faulty, and the fault may alter the cell's output function in any arbitrary way, as long as the cell remains combinational and the fault is permanent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a C-testable [12], has the constant size of test pattern sets. The Design-forTestability methods and a comprehensive study of testability of multipliers have been discussed in detail in [13][14][15][16] where various fault models of different test pattern set size and variant hardware requirement have been studied. High fault coverage of multipliers is achieved with Cell Fault Model [17].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%