The Design of a System for Online Psychosocial Care: Balancing Privacy and Accountability in Sensitive Online Healthcare Environments

Abstract

The design of sensitive online healthcare systems must balance the requirements of privacy and accountability for the good of individuals, organizations, and society. Via a design science research approach, we build and evaluate a sophisticated software system for the online provision of psychosocial healthcare to distributed and vulnerable populations. Multidisciplinary research capabilities are embedded within the system to investigate the effectiveness of online treatment protocols. Throughout the development cycles of the system, we build an emergent design theory of scrutiny that applies a multi-layer protocol to support governance of privacy and accountability in sensitive online applications. The design goal is to balance stakeholder privacy protections with the need to provide for accountable interventions in critical and well-defined care situations. The research implications for the development and governance of online applications in numerous privacy-sensitive application areas are explored

Design suggestions for a persuasive e-coaching application: A study on informal caregivers’ needs

“… 40 Therefore, “monitoring” needs to be used with discretion while also addressing the question of privacy. 41 …”

Digging deeper into responsibility: an investigation of responses to online help-request marketing campaigns in social networking groups

“…The causality aspect focuses on the sense of obligation that is evoked by the connection between the focal actor and the relevant prescriptions that should govern conduct, such as their role requiring specific behaviors in relation to the event (Hall et al ., 2017). In contrast, the aspect of answerability focuses on the liability for sanctions that will be imposed on the focal actor according to the outcome of the event (Sjöström et al ., 2022). The differences between causality and answerability have also been described as “before-the-fact consciousness” versus “after-the-fact accountability” (Culbert, 1974) or “assumed responsibility” versus “assigned responsibility” (Graham, 1986) (see Table 1).…”

My Real Avatar has a Doctor Appointment in the Wepital: A System for Persistent, Efficient, and Ubiquitous Medical Care

“…To this end, each avatar is assigned a fictitious name, and only authorized caregivers know the identity of the patient behind the avatar. This anonymity protects patients’ privacy [115] and enhances their trust in the wepital. To further protect the privacy and promote the trust of each patient, only the patient and authorized caregivers can click the armband and see the vital data in real time.…”