2008
DOI: 10.3103/s0747923908010015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The design and experimental use of the Mikhnevo 2D small aperture seismic array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown recently that small aperture seismic arrays (up to 3 km) are an efficient instrument for monitoring rela tively weak (M b < 2.5) seismic events on regional scale distances. Multichannel processing of the signals at a seismic array recognizes weak arrivals against the background microseismic noise, which opens a funda mentally new possibility to monitor the seismic state of vast territories (Sanina et al, 2008).…”
Section: Estimating the Possibility Of Improving The Accuracy Of Locamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown recently that small aperture seismic arrays (up to 3 km) are an efficient instrument for monitoring rela tively weak (M b < 2.5) seismic events on regional scale distances. Multichannel processing of the signals at a seismic array recognizes weak arrivals against the background microseismic noise, which opens a funda mentally new possibility to monitor the seismic state of vast territories (Sanina et al, 2008).…”
Section: Estimating the Possibility Of Improving The Accuracy Of Locamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ruigrok et al [30] designed and applied a temporary array of 38 seismic stations. I. Sanina et al [31] designed and applied a two-dimensional small-aperture seismic array. Meanwhile, Hu and Li [32] reduced the location error by accurately picking up the velocity of the P wave.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seismic noise level in the area of its location, as shown in Fig. 2 (curve 5), was taken from (Sanina et al, 2008) and recalculated from displacements into accelerations by the formulas given in (Peterson, 1993). It is evident that this level is much higher than the NLNM, as well as the NPSD of the SM 3E sensors, even without optimization of the electronics; this is why the latter sensors were chosen for the seismic station.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%