2012
DOI: 10.1086/668847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Derivation, Properties, and Value of Kepler’s Combined Differential Photometric Precision

Abstract: The Kepler Mission is searching for Earth-size planets orbiting solar-like stars by simultaneously observing >160,000 stars to detect sequences of transit events in the photometric light curves. The Combined Differential Photometric Precision (CDPP) is the metric that defines the ease with which these weak terrestrial 1 See http://kepler.nasa.gov/Mission/discoveries/

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
190
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
190
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A quadratic dependence of photometric precision on the star's boresight is evident for faint stars, and a weak linear dependence is measured for bright stars, with worsening precision at larger distances. See the electronic edition of the PASP for a color version of this figure. boresight was noticed by Christiansen et al (2012), who attributed the effect to the quality of the telescope's focus, which is best between 3-6°from the center of the field. We speculate that the focus quality affects faint stars more than bright stars because they are closer to background-limited photometric precision.…”
Section: Position Dependent Photometric Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A quadratic dependence of photometric precision on the star's boresight is evident for faint stars, and a weak linear dependence is measured for bright stars, with worsening precision at larger distances. See the electronic edition of the PASP for a color version of this figure. boresight was noticed by Christiansen et al (2012), who attributed the effect to the quality of the telescope's focus, which is best between 3-6°from the center of the field. We speculate that the focus quality affects faint stars more than bright stars because they are closer to background-limited photometric precision.…”
Section: Position Dependent Photometric Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kepler's scientific impact comes from its ability to monitor a large field of view with highly precise, high-duty cycle photometry for extended periods of time (≃10 parts per million [ppm] per 6 hr for 10th magnitude stars, Christiansen et al [2012]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming loss through tidal evolution, we are then able to compute the maximum moon mass that can survive for 5 Gyr using the expressions of Barnes & O'Brien (2002). This maximum moon mass is then converted into a radius using an appropriate mass-radius relation and finally into a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) using the Kepler Combined Differential Photometric Precision (CDPP) statistics (Christiansen et al 2012). Target KOIs were selected from the NASA Exoplanet Archive list of KOIs, excluding objects flagged as FPs.…”
Section: Target Selection Automaticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the groundbreaking precision achieved by Kepler (Christiansen et al 2012), when one seeks low signal-to-noise events then the effects of time-correlated noise become important. This is particularly salient for exomoons, since the transits do not follow a simple ephemeris which can be used to check for repeatability (Kipping 2011).…”
Section: The Effects Of Correlated Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1c for Kepler-17. We used the CDPP (Combined Differential Photometric Precision, see Christiansen et al (2012) as an estimation of the noise in the Kepler data. Each quarter of the light curve has an associated CDPP value.…”
Section: Spot Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%