2017
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggx223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The derivation of an anisotropic velocity model from a combined surface and borehole seismic survey in crystalline environment at the COSC-1 borehole, central Sweden

Abstract: . (2017): The derivation of an anisotropic velocity model from a combined surface and borehole seismic survey in crystalline environment at the COSC-1 borehole, central Sweden. -Geophysical Journal International, 210, 3, pp. 1332-1346 S U M M A R YThe Scandinavian Caledonides provide a well-preserved example of a Palaeozoic continentcontinent collision, where surface geology in combination with geophysical data provides information about the geometry of parts of the Caledonian structure. The project COSC (Col… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, anisotropy can be expected for P wave velocities as foliated schist is highly anisotropic (e.g., Allen et al, ; Christensen & Okaya, ; Godfrey et al, ; Li et al, ; Okaya et al, ) and could explain traveltime differences between differing main ray travel paths for borehole and surface receivers. In a similar experiment in Sweden, Simon et al () were able to determine Thomsen parameters and thus an anisotropic velocity model (vertical transverse isotropy, VTI) making use of the different dominant ray paths in surface and borehole analysis. However, the Alpine Fault in the Whataroa Valley dips at ∼50° (Lay et al, ; Toy et al, ) and the fabric dip is between 45° and 55° (Massiot et al, ; Townend et al, ) so that the simplest anisotropy approach would be a tilted transverse isotropy case.…”
Section: Results and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, anisotropy can be expected for P wave velocities as foliated schist is highly anisotropic (e.g., Allen et al, ; Christensen & Okaya, ; Godfrey et al, ; Li et al, ; Okaya et al, ) and could explain traveltime differences between differing main ray travel paths for borehole and surface receivers. In a similar experiment in Sweden, Simon et al () were able to determine Thomsen parameters and thus an anisotropic velocity model (vertical transverse isotropy, VTI) making use of the different dominant ray paths in surface and borehole analysis. However, the Alpine Fault in the Whataroa Valley dips at ∼50° (Lay et al, ; Toy et al, ) and the fabric dip is between 45° and 55° (Massiot et al, ; Townend et al, ) so that the simplest anisotropy approach would be a tilted transverse isotropy case.…”
Section: Results and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krauß (2018) showed that the implementation of velocities from the borehole seismic measurements into the depth conversion of the 3D seismic data adjusts the position of reflections to the ones in the ZOVSP data. P‐wave velocity anisotropy, in particular the mica schist and amphibolites (Kästner et al., 2020; Simon et al., 2017; Wenning et al., 2016), could affect the quality of the seismic data, too. Furthermore, Wrona et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reflections to the ones in the ZOVSP data. P-wave velocity anisotropy, in particular the mica schist and amphibolites (Kästner et al, 2020;Simon et al, 2017;Wenning et al, 2016), could affect the quality of the seismic data, too. Furthermore, Wrona et al (2020) showed that the dip of reflectors and the noise level hamper the recognizability of multiple, sub-parallel, inclined reflections, converging reflections and cross-cutting reflections in seismic imaging.…”
Section: 1029/2020gc009376mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, anisotropy can be expected for P wave velocities as foliated schist is highly anisotropic (e.g., Allen et al, 2017;Christensen & Okaya, 2007;Godfrey et al, 2000;Li et al, 2018;Okaya et al, 1995) and could explain traveltime differences between differing main ray travel paths for borehole and surface receivers. In a similar experiment in Sweden, Simon et al (2017) were able to determine Thomsen parameters and thus an anisotropic velocity model (vertical transverse isotropy, VTI) making use of the different dominant ray paths in surface and borehole analysis. However, the Alpine Fault in the Whataroa Valley dips at ∼50 • (Lay et al, 2016;Toy et al, 2017) and the fabric dip is between 45 • and 55 Townend et al, 2017) so that the simplest anisotropy approach would be a tilted transverse isotropy case.…”
Section: 1029/2019jb018519mentioning
confidence: 99%