2012
DOI: 10.2478/v10089-012-0010-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The depopulation of the Bulgarian villages

Abstract: Abstract. The depopulation process in Bulgaria, especially in rural areas, is intensifying due to deepening unfavourable trends in the dynamics of demographic processes. Depopulation is a typical process in the fourth phase of demographic transition in rural areas of Bulgaria. The death rates exceed birth rates in the rural areas in the mid-1970s. The size of rural population and the number of villages in the country has been decreasing in the last decades. A large part of the villages were affected by depopul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In southeastern Europe, for example, Macedonia's mountain population has declined by 50% since the 1950s, reducing the size of villages and ultimately the ability of self-governance (Madzevic and Toshevska 2016). For Bulgaria, high depopulation rates in border and mountains regions have been reported for the period since the end of World War II and especially since 1985 (Mladenov and Ilieva 2012). A similar picture appears in Romania, judging from the situation in the mountains of Apuseni, where population peaked in 1941 but has declined ever since, with depopulation rates accelerating after the change of the political regime in 1990.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In southeastern Europe, for example, Macedonia's mountain population has declined by 50% since the 1950s, reducing the size of villages and ultimately the ability of self-governance (Madzevic and Toshevska 2016). For Bulgaria, high depopulation rates in border and mountains regions have been reported for the period since the end of World War II and especially since 1985 (Mladenov and Ilieva 2012). A similar picture appears in Romania, judging from the situation in the mountains of Apuseni, where population peaked in 1941 but has declined ever since, with depopulation rates accelerating after the change of the political regime in 1990.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Another example of SPTs is the Aragón region (Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón) in Spain, one of the most sparsely populated regions in Europe (Escalona-Orcao-Díez-Cornago 2007). Bulgaria is another country suffering from intensive depopulation (Mladenov-Ilieva 2012). Mladenov and Ilieva (2012) point out that depopulation in Bulgaria hit mountainous and border villages the most.…”
Section: Methodological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bulgaria is another country suffering from intensive depopulation (Mladenov-Ilieva 2012). Mladenov and Ilieva (2012) point out that depopulation in Bulgaria hit mountainous and border villages the most. Dozens of villages were excluded from the national settlement registry 1 in Bulgaria.…”
Section: Methodological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation in the smallest villages is the worst. These problems are not peculiar to Hungary; the situation is very similar in other Eastern and Southern European countries [12], [43], [44], [45]. Often under population is critical as villages could die out in time [46], [47].…”
Section: The Evolution Of Small Villages Over the Last Few Decadesmentioning
confidence: 95%