1972
DOI: 10.2307/746992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dependent Variable: Measurement Issues in Reading Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More experimental and strong quasi-experimental designs were implemented in the 1980s than in the prior 65 years combined. Also around this time, GE and AE scores felt out of favor as researchers such as Farr and Tuinman (1972) pointed out that statistical tests of effects require scores with equal-interval scales and that any quantitative analysis of AE and GE scores is inappropriate and should not be published. These advancements in methodology allowed for greater precision in measuring effects and for more robust conclusions to be drawn about the relative effectiveness of different interventions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More experimental and strong quasi-experimental designs were implemented in the 1980s than in the prior 65 years combined. Also around this time, GE and AE scores felt out of favor as researchers such as Farr and Tuinman (1972) pointed out that statistical tests of effects require scores with equal-interval scales and that any quantitative analysis of AE and GE scores is inappropriate and should not be published. These advancements in methodology allowed for greater precision in measuring effects and for more robust conclusions to be drawn about the relative effectiveness of different interventions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to establish patterns of interactions among various perceptual processes have often relied on measures such as the Frostig Developmental Test of Visual Perception and Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities whose validity has been questioned (Weiner et al, 1967;Myers and Hammill, 1969;Ryckman and Wiegerink, 1969). The conclusions of Farr and Tuinman (1972) are relevant; they criticise the practice of establishing test validity by computing correlations with existing tests, possibly resulting in shared method variance rather than construct variance. The present research thus comprised the first stage in a multiple-step project designed to investigate the separate and collective contributions of various measures of conception and perception towards reading and arithmetic achievement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies had compared the performances of first-grade readers after an academic year's instruction by either of these methods. Emphasizing the differential results in the varying responses which compose reading behavior and which are measurable by different tests and sub-tests of reading achievement (Farr & Tuinman, 1972), these studies have shown that at the end of first grade the phonics method produces better results than the sight recognition method in phonics skills, word recognition, oral reading, and spelling (Bliesmer & Yarborough, 1965;Bond & Dykstra, 1967;Chall, 1967). Chall alone reports significant differences (disputed by the other two pairs of writers) in favor of the sight recognition method, on measures of meaning and rate of reading.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%