2004
DOI: 10.1029/2004gl019413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dependence of Langmuir wave amplitudes on position in Earth's foreshock

Abstract: [1] We present the first results of Langmuir wave observations in the foreshock from the Cluster WBD Plasma Wave Receiver. When the data were binned by distance to the foreshock boundary, the Langmuir wave amplitude probability distributions followed the lognormal statistics predicted by stochastic growth theory for all regions of the foreshock. The Cluster data show for the first time that the centers of the probability distributions shift to lower amplitudes with increasing distance to the boundary, and that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4. In contrast, the probability distribution for all values of D f from Cluster spacecraft 3 on 17 February 2002, discussed in Sigsbee et al (2004), appeared to be Gaussian for amplitudes less than 1-2 mV/m but resembled a power law for larger amplitudes. Figure 4d shows the probability distributions from selected 1 R E bins in D f for spacecraft 4 for the time period 01:30:30-01:51:40 UT on 26 March 2002 with fits to a Gaussian (dotted line).…”
Section: Amplitude Probability Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4. In contrast, the probability distribution for all values of D f from Cluster spacecraft 3 on 17 February 2002, discussed in Sigsbee et al (2004), appeared to be Gaussian for amplitudes less than 1-2 mV/m but resembled a power law for larger amplitudes. Figure 4d shows the probability distributions from selected 1 R E bins in D f for spacecraft 4 for the time period 01:30:30-01:51:40 UT on 26 March 2002 with fits to a Gaussian (dotted line).…”
Section: Amplitude Probability Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Only 0.03% of the waveforms observed by spacecraft 4 were excluded due to clipping, but more than 95% of the waveforms had to be rejected because they fell below the minimum amplitude threshold. The result was that the probability distributions constructed for spacecraft 4 on 17 February 2002 by Sigsbee et al (2004) were only valid for uncorrected amplitudes between 2.0 mV/m and 36.9 mV/m. The WBD receiver was designed with a great deal of overlap between the amplitude ranges for the various gain settings, so it may be possible to correct for the effects of non-optimal auto-ranging by comparing the results from different gain states for the same amplitude range.…”
Section: Effects Of Non-optimal Auto-ranging On Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All data presented here were observed on 17 February 2002, when Cluster was in the foreshock close to the foreshock boundary given by the interplanetary magnetic field line tangent to the bow shock (tangential line). This region of foreshock is appropriate for our study, since Langmuir waves with the largest amplitudes are observed close to this boundary [Sigsbee et al, 2004].…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%