2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.02.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The density of andesitic melts and the compressibility of dissolved water in silicate melts at crustal and upper mantle conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To exclude the uncertainties related to variations in experimental methods, including assessments of supercooling or glass transition, we excluded density measurements based on quenched or supercooled materials, and density measurements obtained by indirect methods, such as length measurement and the sink/float method. Based on our criteria, above‐liquidus in situ density measurements of various hydrous melts by X‐ray absorption [ Sakamaki et al ., ; Seifert et al ., ; Malfait et al ., ] and direct volume measurements of hydrous albite melts [ Burnham and Davis , ], are used for parameter optimization. The density values of the experiments of Burnham and Davis [] were taken from Ochs and Lange [, Table 6].…”
Section: Parameterssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To exclude the uncertainties related to variations in experimental methods, including assessments of supercooling or glass transition, we excluded density measurements based on quenched or supercooled materials, and density measurements obtained by indirect methods, such as length measurement and the sink/float method. Based on our criteria, above‐liquidus in situ density measurements of various hydrous melts by X‐ray absorption [ Sakamaki et al ., ; Seifert et al ., ; Malfait et al ., ] and direct volume measurements of hydrous albite melts [ Burnham and Davis , ], are used for parameter optimization. The density values of the experiments of Burnham and Davis [] were taken from Ochs and Lange [, Table 6].…”
Section: Parameterssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Consequently, the pressure gap in the database means that the volumetric properties of hydrous melts, especially K T and K, cannot be precisely constrained [ Agee , ]. Recently, using the X‐ray absorption method, in situ density measurements of various hydrous silicate melts, including mafic basalt, phonolite, rhyolite, and andesite, have been reported at pressure ranges of <5 GPa [ Sakamaki et al ., ; Seifert et al ., ; Malfait et al ., ]. These new, precise in situ density measurements cover the compositional and pressure ranges of subduction zone melting regions with numerous experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, the EOS for silicate liquids at high pressures relevant to the Earth's upper mantle and transition zone was mainly constrained using the density data obtained by static compression such as sink‐float (e.g., Agee, ; Agee & Walker, ; Ghosh et al, ; Jing & Karato, ; Matsukage et al, ) and X‐ray absorption experiments (e.g., Malfait et al, ; Sakamaki et al, ; Seifert et al, ). However, the obtained EOS often have large uncertainties due to the scarcity of data from sink‐float measurements and the limited pressure range for X‐ray absorption method (e.g., Agee, ; Agee & Walker, ; Malfait et al, ): There exists a large trade‐off between the fitted bulk modulus ( K ) and its pressure derivative ( K′ ) due to the strong correlation between these two EOS parameters (Bass et al, ; Jing & Karato, ). Hugoniot data obtained by shock compression (e.g., Asimow & Ahrens, ; Rigden et al, ; Thomas & Asimow, ) can help place tighter constraints on K and K′ due to the wider pressure range in the measurements, but the reduction of shock‐wave data requires assumptions on high‐pressure thermal properties since shock temperatures were not determined directly in these experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advanced technique becomes popular for melt density measurements. This technique combines synchrotron X-ray absorption measurement with a large volume press and has been conducted successfully on a number of melts by several authors (Katayama et al, 1993;Sanloup et al, 2000;Sakamaki et al, 2009Sakamaki et al, , 2010aSakamaki et al, , 2010bSakamaki et al, , 2011Nishida et al, 2011;van Kan Parker et al, 2012;Sakamaki et al, 2013;Seifert et al, 2013;Malfait et al, 2014aMalfait et al, , 2014b. This well-established technique allows us to measure density of liquid under desired pressure and temperature conditions with much improved precision and accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%