1990
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1990)102<0160:tdfsaa>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Denali fault system and Alaska Range of Alaska: Evidence for underplated Mesozoic flysch from magnetotelluric surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
1
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous interpretations of MT data collected along five transects near and across the Alaska Range (Stanley, 1986(Stanley, , 1989Stanley et al, 1990) indicate a different distribution of rock resistivities from what we show here. In these early studies, a near-surface rock layer north of the Denali fault was found to vary in thickness from 4 to 7 km and to be characterized by a wide range of resistivity values (170-9900 X•m) that was identified as the amphibolite-facies schist of the YTT.…”
Section: Magnetotelluric Datacontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous interpretations of MT data collected along five transects near and across the Alaska Range (Stanley, 1986(Stanley, , 1989Stanley et al, 1990) indicate a different distribution of rock resistivities from what we show here. In these early studies, a near-surface rock layer north of the Denali fault was found to vary in thickness from 4 to 7 km and to be characterized by a wide range of resistivity values (170-9900 X•m) that was identified as the amphibolite-facies schist of the YTT.…”
Section: Magnetotelluric Datacontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The most likely source of the lowresistivity body was inferred to be carbon-rich Jurassic and Cretaceous flysch like that making up the Kahiltna terrane. One difference between the earlier impedance model (Stanley, 1986(Stanley, , 1989Stanley et al, 1990) and the one presented here (Fig. 9) is that the temporal recording range used to obtain the earlier data was about an order of magnitude higher than that used for data shown here.…”
Section: Magnetotelluric Datamentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results therefore suggest that the same or a very similar body is being imaged on corridors 2 and 3. Ledo et al (2004) provide an interpretation of this dipping structure and compare it with a lower crustal conductor observed to the north in Alaska (Stanley et al 1990). The northeast-dipping conductor on the SNORCLE transect lies above, and parallel to, a suite of reflectors located at mantle depths that were interpreted by Cook et al (2001Cook et al ( , 2004 to be associated with convergent subduction of the Kula plate in the Paleocene (Engebretson et al 1984).…”
Section: Comparison Between Corridors 2 Andmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The coincidence of the geometry of the conductor and the inferred position of the subducting slab provides a strong indication that the decreased resistivity is related to the Paleocene Kula plate subduction. The original explanation of the Alaskan Range conductor was that it was due to metasedimentary rocks emplaced into the deeper crust by the underthrusting of carbonaceous flysch during mid-Cretaceous convergence (Stanley et al 1990). Ledo et al (2004) suggest that the crustal part of the conductor observed on corridors 2 and 3 may also be metasedimentary rocks imbricated during Kula plate subduction.…”
Section: Comparison Between Corridors 2 Andmentioning
confidence: 99%