2017
DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2017.1304565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The demography of words: The global decline in non-numeric fertility preferences, 1993–2011

Abstract: This paper examines the decline in non-numeric responses to questions about fertility preferences among women in the developing world. These types of responses—such as “don’t know” or “it’s up to God”—have often been interpreted through the lens of fertility transition theory as an indication that reproduction has not yet entered women’s “calculus of conscious choice” (Coale 1973, p. 65), but have yet to be investigated cross-nationally and over time. Using 19 years of data from 32 countries, we find that non-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Desired family size is an abstract concept and in high-fertility populations, as in our study sites, there may be an inability or unwillingness to provide a numerical answer for desired number of children if reproductive choice and agency are not yet fully accepted [ 28 ]. However, analysis of the DHS data from 32 countries showed that women’s provision of non-numeric responses to the desired family size question declined over a 19-year period (1993–2011) [ 28 ]; additionally, this study reported that as fertility rates declined, the proportion of women giving non-numeric responses also decreased. Knowledge about, and use of, contraception as well as level of education were inversely related to providing non-numeric responses where a numerical response is required [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desired family size is an abstract concept and in high-fertility populations, as in our study sites, there may be an inability or unwillingness to provide a numerical answer for desired number of children if reproductive choice and agency are not yet fully accepted [ 28 ]. However, analysis of the DHS data from 32 countries showed that women’s provision of non-numeric responses to the desired family size question declined over a 19-year period (1993–2011) [ 28 ]; additionally, this study reported that as fertility rates declined, the proportion of women giving non-numeric responses also decreased. Knowledge about, and use of, contraception as well as level of education were inversely related to providing non-numeric responses where a numerical response is required [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively small numbers of women report a desired family size that equals their actual family size. It may also be the case that the extent of such ex post rationalisations vary substantially depending on the cultural context as is the case with non-numeric responses [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, non-numeric responses (such as “up to God”) are problematic, though the make up less than 10% of the responses in the majority of surveys. Non-numeric responses have been found to be much more common amongst those with less education and a lower level of contraceptive knowledge, though such responses are increasingly rare [26]. We excluded non-numeric responses (in line with Casterline and Han) as they could not be incorporated into the AINC and such responses suggested that the very idea of a mismatch between fertility ideals and outcomes would make no sense to respondents who answered in this way [7].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While concerns about data quality are valid, data availability (if not quality) has been improving, and statistical methods for treating preferences as dynamic processes have advanced considerably. Non‐numeric responses to questions about fertility desires such as “Don't know” and “Up to God” have declined (Frye and Bachan ), suggesting that the vast majority of women think numerically about the future with respect to their families.…”
Section: Uncertainty and Fertility In Africamentioning
confidence: 99%