2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The democracy deficit of corporate social responsibility in post-neoliberal times: an analysis of the Argentinian and Ecuadorian experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our work, the company and governments mostly decide without consulting the communities. This can lead to conflicts with communities (Cisneros and Christel, 2014).…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our work, the company and governments mostly decide without consulting the communities. This can lead to conflicts with communities (Cisneros and Christel, 2014).…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Idemudia (2009) found that some mining companies focus on pleasing community elites, thus relegating the needs of the community. Among these elites, Cisneros & Christel (2014) include governments and some NGOs closer to companies. This situation has generated important local conflicts in Latin American countries.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acknowledging the difficulties that the concept of post‐neoliberalism poses when evaluating it in relation to neoliberalism—as the concept might simultaneously evocate a form of anti‐neoliberalism, the end of neoliberalism, or just a new version of classic neoliberalism—Macdonald and Ruckert (2009) suggest using post‐neoliberalism as a conceptual tool ‘to capture the discontinuity within the continuity of policies that are currently implemented by a wide range of governments in the Americas' (Macdonald & Ruckert, 2009, p. 7). On the continuity side, different authors argue that at a macro‐level, most countries in Latin America continued to adhere to ‘classic' neoliberal prescriptions, such as trade liberalization, moderate inflation, balanced budget (Ruckert et al., 2017), and significantly, most of them rely heavily on natural recourse extraction and primary commodity exports (Cisneros & Christel, 2014). On the discontinuity side, authors highlight trends such as: a change of perception about the inevitability of neoliberal fundamentalist policies (Roberts, 2009; Silva, 2009), partial reversion of privatizations, efforts at restoring the regulatory role of the state (Heidrich & Tussie, 2009), increasing social spending, and innovative anti‐poverty policies (Grugel & Riggirozzi, 2018), among others.…”
Section: Post‐neoliberalism?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Legislative Commission, controlled by Correa's faction, passed a new sectoral law in early 2009 (Ley de Minería) under heavy criticism from anti‐mining activists. This law responds to the logic promoted by the government, but mining companies did not fully endorse it for its nationalistic character (Cisneros & Christel, 2014). The law creates a State‐owned company and a specialized agency that oversees mining operations.…”
Section: Subsystem Dynamics and The Bans On Mining In Four Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%