“…Acknowledging the difficulties that the concept of post‐neoliberalism poses when evaluating it in relation to neoliberalism—as the concept might simultaneously evocate a form of anti‐neoliberalism, the end of neoliberalism, or just a new version of classic neoliberalism—Macdonald and Ruckert (2009) suggest using post‐neoliberalism as a conceptual tool ‘to capture the discontinuity within the continuity of policies that are currently implemented by a wide range of governments in the Americas' (Macdonald & Ruckert, 2009, p. 7). On the continuity side, different authors argue that at a macro‐level, most countries in Latin America continued to adhere to ‘classic' neoliberal prescriptions, such as trade liberalization, moderate inflation, balanced budget (Ruckert et al., 2017), and significantly, most of them rely heavily on natural recourse extraction and primary commodity exports (Cisneros & Christel, 2014). On the discontinuity side, authors highlight trends such as: a change of perception about the inevitability of neoliberal fundamentalist policies (Roberts, 2009; Silva, 2009), partial reversion of privatizations, efforts at restoring the regulatory role of the state (Heidrich & Tussie, 2009), increasing social spending, and innovative anti‐poverty policies (Grugel & Riggirozzi, 2018), among others.…”