1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9934(199609)16:6<697::aid-fut5>3.0.co;2-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The demise of the high fructose corn syrup futures contract: A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cornell (1981) indicates the variability in the spot market prices to be the most significant factor. Thompson et al (1996) attribute the demise of the corn syrup future to a highly concentrated market and poor contract specifications, less homogenous product; small sized spot market and the inability of the contract to attract sufficient participants in the futures market. Williams et al (1998) make an interesting observation about the positive influence of futures trading on the China Zhengzhou commodity exchange on the spot market practices, like the adoption of better-quality standards.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cornell (1981) indicates the variability in the spot market prices to be the most significant factor. Thompson et al (1996) attribute the demise of the corn syrup future to a highly concentrated market and poor contract specifications, less homogenous product; small sized spot market and the inability of the contract to attract sufficient participants in the futures market. Williams et al (1998) make an interesting observation about the positive influence of futures trading on the China Zhengzhou commodity exchange on the spot market practices, like the adoption of better-quality standards.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature lists many spot market features as being crucial to the success of a futures contract: the presence of a centralized cash market, liquidity of cash market, whether it is active (i.e., sufficient frequency of transactions), the size of cash market (whether it is large enough to attract potential participants in the futures market as hedgers and speculators), the volatility of spot prices, the availability of public information and the absence of market power (Brorsen and Fofana, 2001;Thompson, Garcia and Wildman, 1996). It is not easy to test for the impact of some of these factors because they could be endogenous to the presence or absence of a futures market.…”
Section: Literature and Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been well documented that contract design is critical to attracting liquidity (Working;Gray, 1960 and1978;Thompson et al, 1996). Particularly in the case of contracts for commodities of differing qualities than those already covered in existing contracts, the specification of quality must closely meet industry needs, represent quality that was previously ineffectively hedged with existing contracts, and represent sufficient volume to support futures trading (which might be quite small as previously discussed in an electronic trading environment).…”
Section: Importance Of Contract Design Spreading and Quality Certifimentioning
confidence: 99%