The Delphi Method

Humphrey‐Murto, Susan; Wood, Timothy; Gonsalves, Carol; Mascioli, Kelly; Varpio, Lara

doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002887

Cited by 66 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The Delphi method has several advantages, given in the present study. These advantages include the following: participants can be found anywhere in the world, a quick consensus of those discussed is obtained, it covers a wide range of expertise, avoids long interpretations and discussions, the predicted questions are specific and have predetermined answers, and you get a final report agreed by all experts during the study ( Linstone and Turoff et al, 1976 ; Gordon and Pease, 2006 ; Botterill and Platenkamp, 2014 ; Chalmers and Armour, 2019 ; Humphrey-Murto et al, 2020 ). Find involved experts who consider that the final report is an adequate one and contains vital information for the targeted field.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Importance of Psychosocial Factors Associated With Sustainable Organizational Development During COVID-19

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Involvement in sustainable development is a voluntary activity. Organizations apply the principles of sustainable development only when they identify several benefits. These benefits are identified, especially with the financial ones. The involvement of organizations in sustainable organizations has different intensity levels. These intensity levels are influenced by psychosocial factors (PF), attitudes toward organizational risks, and organizational and urban policies. The present paper identifies the key psychological factors involved in applying organizational sustainability principles within organizations. For this research, five groups were created for in-depth interviews with key people from Romania’s innovative companies. To identify the importance of the framework analysis factors, the Delphi method was used, in which 20 experts from different fields of activity were involved. Following the rounds involved in the Delphi method, the ranking of PF on four levels of importance was accepted, based on planned behavior and reasoned action theory. These levels were correlated with the intensity levels of involvement in sustainable development. The entire market study was conducted during COVID-19, which significantly impacted specific directions. As a result, it could be observed that motivation, learning attitude, behavior, and intention to take precedence are essential in the organizational sustainability approach.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Importance of Psychosocial Factors Associated With Sustainable Organizational Development During COVID-19

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Es necesario definir el número de rondas que tiene previsto durar el estudio a priori para evitar que se llegue a un «falso consenso» por agotamiento de los expertos, que aceptan para finalizar el proceso. Aunque no existe unanimidad, la mayoría de estudios Delphi realizan entre dos y tres rondas 13 , por lo que deben considerarse un mínimo de dos y un máximo de cuatro rondas 4 , 16 .…”

Section: Elementos Esenciales Del Método Delphiunclassified

“…Los resultados de varias rondas de un estudio Delphi pueden ser difíciles de comunicar 11 . Una versión muy resumida en caso de que existan pocos ítems sería mostrar solo los ítems que han logrado el consenso, aunque también es aconsejable expresar los ítems añadidos, los eliminados y los modificados 11 , 16 . Para ayudar a elaborar el informe se puede realizar un diagrama como el de la figura 2 , donde se observa que mediante la revisión bibliográfica los autores partieron de 7 categorías y 70 ítems.…”

Section: Elementos Esenciales Del Método Delphiunclassified

Elementos esenciales para elaborar un estudio con el método (e)Delphi

Romero-Collado

2021

Enfermería Intensiva

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A modified Delphi was used to develop consensus around SBME priorities and present a list of content to guide future simulation-based educational priorities such as generating a standard critical care simulation curriculum [14][15][16]. The Delphi method relies on expert opinion to arrive at these conclusions.…”

Section: Design and Delphi Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A six-step approach is adopted when utilizing this process: (1) stating the problem, (2) developing an initial questionnaire, (3) selecting experts, (4) iteratively polling experts, (5) identifying potential consensus points, and (6) reporting results. This approach allows for an iterative understanding of the question with feedback given by experts between cycles [16][17][18] (Figure 1).…”

Section: Design and Delphi Processmentioning

confidence: 99%