2014
DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2014.891087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Degree of Ad–Brand Incongruity and the Distinction Between Schema-Driven and Stimulus-Driven Attitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After assessing the measurement model, investigating the fit of the structural model is appropriate. The two manipulating conditions were inserted as independent variables in the model, in line with previous studies suggesting the use of SEM on experimental data, when the data involves multiple latent variables (Halkias & Kokkinaki, 2014). The goodness-of-fit statistics revealed that the model fits the data reasonably well (χ²=795.60, df=240; p<0.001).…”
Section: Measures and Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 52%
“…After assessing the measurement model, investigating the fit of the structural model is appropriate. The two manipulating conditions were inserted as independent variables in the model, in line with previous studies suggesting the use of SEM on experimental data, when the data involves multiple latent variables (Halkias & Kokkinaki, 2014). The goodness-of-fit statistics revealed that the model fits the data reasonably well (χ²=795.60, df=240; p<0.001).…”
Section: Measures and Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 52%
“…If the degree of incongruity is very high and cannot be explained by existing schemata, consumers become frustrated with their inability to resolve the inconsistency, resulting in a negative evaluation. Therefore, only in conditions of moderate incongruity are consumers able to resolve inconsistency and experience joy and psychological gratification as a result of solving the problem, leading to a better product evaluation or increased advertising effectiveness (Halkias & Kokkinaki, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, the brand schema is a memory-stored cognitive structure that consists of all the associations consumers attach to a brand as well as of the information specifying the properties of these associations and their interrelation (Boush and Loken, 1991;Halkias and Kokkinaki, 2014;Hoyer and MacInnis, 2008;Sjödin and Törn, 2006). Therefore, brand schemata carry information regarding functional and symbolic attributes, attribute interrelations, and affective assessment that pertain to a brand and its features (Brannon andBrock, 1994, 2006;Dahlén et al, 2005;Goodstein, 1993).…”
Section: The Brand Schemamentioning
confidence: 99%