The deformation behavior of ceramic crystals subjected to very low load (nano)indentations

Abstract

The ultra-low load indentation response of ceramic single crystal surfaces (Al2O3, SiC, Si) has been studied with a software-controlled hardness tester (Nanoindenter) operating in the load range 2–60 mN. In all cases, scanning and transmission electron microscopy have been used to characterize the deformation structures associated with these very small-scale hardness impressions. Emphasis has been placed on correlating the deformation behavior observed for particular indentations with irregularities in recorded load-displacement curves. For carefully annealed sapphire, a threshold load (for a given indenter) was observed below which the only surface response was elastic flexure and beyond which dislocation loop nucleation occurred at, or near, the theoretical shear strength to create the indentation. This onset of plasticity was seen as a sudden displacement discontinuity in the load-displacement response. At higher loads, indentations appeared to be accommodated predominantly by dislocation activity, though microcracks were observed to form ät contact loads of only tens of milliNewtons. Possibly such cracks are the incipient slip-induced nuclei for the much larger, indentation-induced cracks usually apparent only on the surface at much higher loads and often used for estimating indentation toughness. By contrast, silicon did not show this behavior but exhibited unusually large amounts of depth recovery within indentations, resulting in a characteristic reverse thrust on the indenter during unloading. TEM studies of indentations in silicon revealed less evidence of obvious dislocation activity than in sapphire (particularly at the lowest loads used) but did show residual highly imperfect–and often amorphous–structures within the indentations, consistent with a densification transformation occurring at the very high hydrostatic stresses produced under the indenter. The reverse thrust is caused by the relaxation of densified material during unloading. Thus, it appears that the low-load hardness response of silicon is controlled by a pressure-sensitive phase transformation. Though SiC has been predicted to undergo a densification transformation similar to silicon, its load-displacement behavior was found to be similar to Al2O3 suggesting that, for these contact experiments at least, the critical resolved shear stress for dislocation nucleation is exceeded before the critical hydrostatic pressure for densification is reached. In all cases, residual, plastically formed indentations were measured to be smaller than the fully loaded indentation depths would suggest, confirming that a significant portion of the deformation is elastic surface flexure. However, there is some doubt as to whether silicon displays elastic-only deformation even at very small penetration depths. The use of microstructural studies to complement nanoindentation experiments is shown to be a key route not only to interpreting the recorded load-displacement responses, but also to examining the deformation mechanisms controlling the mechanical behavior of ceramics to surface contacts at these small spatial scales.

Nanoindentation-induced defect–interface interactions: phenomena, methods and limitations

“…Initial observations [6,7] and later extensive papers [12±16] have now dealt exclusively with the fact that nanoindentation can detect the onset of dislocation nucleation. While not nanoindentation, this was ®rst suggested by Gane and Bowden's [17] and Pethica and Tabor's [18] seminal experiments exhibiting yield instabilities of sharp gold point contacts via TEM [17] and resistivity [18] techniques.…”

Nanoindentation: Toward the sensing of atomic interactions

“…Typical loads lie between 0.1 and 10 N, with indentation diameters of about 10-100 m, which are measured with sufficient accuracy by optical microscopy. A different approach is to measure the penetration depth of the indenter by using microdisplacement transducers of great accuracy (5). In this case, typical loads lie between 10 Ϫ5 and 10 Ϫ2 N. At this level, microhardness measurements reveal that for metals, the hardness tends to increase as the size of the indenter is reduced (6); this is attributed to the limited range of dislocation movement available when very small volumes are involved.…”

Effect of aging and solution annealing on transformation and deformation mechanism of super-elastic Ni50.9%-Ti alloy in nano- scale

“…Nevertheless, there were no significant discontinuities observed in unloading (except for pop-ins ) in loading portion are shown by arrows in figure 4. For some of the conventional metals it has been shown that discontinuities in the loading portion of nanoindentation is an indication of dislocation nucleation and/or movement [10]. Nevertheless, in this experiment, for the aged sample, A Sample, such explanation is not valid as the final depth of indent for the indents with maximum load close to zero and there is no trace of permanent deformation on the surface of material.…”