“…Effects of phosphate on fluoride removal were also reported by [146]. The tendency of the anions to form inner-sphere complexes was reported by [28,29,32,63,170,174,175,177,178,[180][181][182][183]. Chloride ions formed outer-sphere surface complexes and had a minor effect on fluoride adsorption; thus they are less absorbed on the absorbent surface [65].…”
Section: Effects Of Anion Cation and Organicmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The adsorption of anions decreases by increasing pH due to the higher concentration of competitive anions, such as OH − and increases due to protonated surfaces. In aqueous solution, the adsorption process is primarily governed by the zero point charge (ZPC) of an adsorbent [31,32]. At zero point charge, the pHzpc is the characteristic that determines the pH at which the adsorbent surface has net electrical neutrality.…”
Section: Adsorption Methods For Arsenic and Fluoride Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At pH between 4.4 and 12, 500 mg/L of carbonate and bicarbonate ions concentration was reported to decrease the fluoride adsorption on acidic alumina [32]. Fluoride adsorption was reduced significantly as bicarbonate was acting as a pH buffering agent, and its existence in solution increases and buffered the pH; therefore, the adsorption of fluoride was decresed [4,155,166] Kamble et al [4] reported that the addition of CO 3 2− , SO 4 2− , and HCO 3 − ions increases pH of fluoride solution in adsorption of fluoride on alumina of alkoxide nature.…”
Section: Effects Of Anion Cation and Organicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the protonated surface is accountable for anions adsorption, the maximum fluoride adsorption for many adsorbents occurs at acidic pH [32,63] and decreases at higher pH values. For adsorbents like activated alumina, fluoride adsorption is controlled by pH at point zero charges (pHzpc) [32,73]. At a certain selected pH, the adsorption showed an increasing trend due to the positively charged alumina complexes AlF 2+ and AlF 2 + on fluoride removal by acidic alumina [32].…”
Section: Effects Of Ph On Fluoride Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For adsorbents like activated alumina, fluoride adsorption is controlled by pH at point zero charges (pHzpc) [32,73]. At a certain selected pH, the adsorption showed an increasing trend due to the positively charged alumina complexes AlF 2+ and AlF 2 + on fluoride removal by acidic alumina [32]. The fluoride adsorption decreased after pHzpc because the concentration of protonated surface sites decreases with increasing pH [4,73], which causes strong competition of hydroxide ions [57].…”
Section: Effects Of Ph On Fluoride Removalmentioning
This paper presents a comparative review of arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), and fluoride (F − ) for a better understanding of the conditions and factors during their adsorption with focus on (i) the isotherm adsorption models, (ii) effects of pH, (iii) effects of ionic strength, and (iv) effects of coexisting substances such as anions, cations, and natural organics matter. It provides an indepth analysis of various methods of arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), and fluoride (F − ) removal by adsorption and the anions' characteristics during the adsorption process. The surface area of the adsorbents does not contribute to the adsorption capacity of these anions but rather a combination of other physical and chemical properties. The adsorption capacity for the anions depends on the combination of all the factors: pH, ionic strength, coexisting substances, pore volume and particles size, surface modification, pretreatment of the adsorbents, and so forth. Extreme higher adsorption capacity can be obtained by the modification of the adsorbents. In general, pH has a greater influence on adsorption capacity at large, since it affects the ionic strength, coexisting anions such as bicarbonate, sulfate, and silica, the surface charges of the adsorbents, and the ionic species which can be present in the solution.
“…Effects of phosphate on fluoride removal were also reported by [146]. The tendency of the anions to form inner-sphere complexes was reported by [28,29,32,63,170,174,175,177,178,[180][181][182][183]. Chloride ions formed outer-sphere surface complexes and had a minor effect on fluoride adsorption; thus they are less absorbed on the absorbent surface [65].…”
Section: Effects Of Anion Cation and Organicmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The adsorption of anions decreases by increasing pH due to the higher concentration of competitive anions, such as OH − and increases due to protonated surfaces. In aqueous solution, the adsorption process is primarily governed by the zero point charge (ZPC) of an adsorbent [31,32]. At zero point charge, the pHzpc is the characteristic that determines the pH at which the adsorbent surface has net electrical neutrality.…”
Section: Adsorption Methods For Arsenic and Fluoride Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At pH between 4.4 and 12, 500 mg/L of carbonate and bicarbonate ions concentration was reported to decrease the fluoride adsorption on acidic alumina [32]. Fluoride adsorption was reduced significantly as bicarbonate was acting as a pH buffering agent, and its existence in solution increases and buffered the pH; therefore, the adsorption of fluoride was decresed [4,155,166] Kamble et al [4] reported that the addition of CO 3 2− , SO 4 2− , and HCO 3 − ions increases pH of fluoride solution in adsorption of fluoride on alumina of alkoxide nature.…”
Section: Effects Of Anion Cation and Organicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the protonated surface is accountable for anions adsorption, the maximum fluoride adsorption for many adsorbents occurs at acidic pH [32,63] and decreases at higher pH values. For adsorbents like activated alumina, fluoride adsorption is controlled by pH at point zero charges (pHzpc) [32,73]. At a certain selected pH, the adsorption showed an increasing trend due to the positively charged alumina complexes AlF 2+ and AlF 2 + on fluoride removal by acidic alumina [32].…”
Section: Effects Of Ph On Fluoride Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For adsorbents like activated alumina, fluoride adsorption is controlled by pH at point zero charges (pHzpc) [32,73]. At a certain selected pH, the adsorption showed an increasing trend due to the positively charged alumina complexes AlF 2+ and AlF 2 + on fluoride removal by acidic alumina [32]. The fluoride adsorption decreased after pHzpc because the concentration of protonated surface sites decreases with increasing pH [4,73], which causes strong competition of hydroxide ions [57].…”
Section: Effects Of Ph On Fluoride Removalmentioning
This paper presents a comparative review of arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), and fluoride (F − ) for a better understanding of the conditions and factors during their adsorption with focus on (i) the isotherm adsorption models, (ii) effects of pH, (iii) effects of ionic strength, and (iv) effects of coexisting substances such as anions, cations, and natural organics matter. It provides an indepth analysis of various methods of arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), and fluoride (F − ) removal by adsorption and the anions' characteristics during the adsorption process. The surface area of the adsorbents does not contribute to the adsorption capacity of these anions but rather a combination of other physical and chemical properties. The adsorption capacity for the anions depends on the combination of all the factors: pH, ionic strength, coexisting substances, pore volume and particles size, surface modification, pretreatment of the adsorbents, and so forth. Extreme higher adsorption capacity can be obtained by the modification of the adsorbents. In general, pH has a greater influence on adsorption capacity at large, since it affects the ionic strength, coexisting anions such as bicarbonate, sulfate, and silica, the surface charges of the adsorbents, and the ionic species which can be present in the solution.
Good quality drinking water is necessary to maintain a high quality of life. Millions lack access to clean and safe drinking water, and current trends suggest that billions will face acute water shortages in the coming decades. Development of new materials has led to technological impacts on water purification, from desalination membranes to atmospheric water scavenging. However, the most challenging aspect of technological solutions is cost: if the community being serviced cannot afford the solution, it is not likely to be sustainable. Repurposing Earth‐abundant materials to replace highly engineered solutions is an atractive solution. Herein, minimal processing of bauxite rocks produces a high‐porosity and reactive activated alumina in situ, without purification directly from the ore. This acid‐treated, thermally activated bauxite (ATAB) exhibits a high surface area of 401 ± 6 m2 g−1, a 40‐fold increase relative to its parent ore, and a 2× increase relative to the state‐of‐the‐art fluoride adsorbent, activated alumina. The composition, preparation, and mechanism of adsorption are studied by X‐ray diffraction, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and multiple‐quantum magic‐angle spinning 27Al nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The maximum adsorption density of ATAB is comparable with that of activated alumina, but ATAB requires fewer processing steps, thus warranting future consideration as a primary adsorbent of choice for fluoride removal from water.
A systematic, yet simple method for the decoloration of Panax notoginseng extracts has been developed by static adsorption tests and response surface methodology. Through static adsorption experiment screening, acidic alumina was selected because of its high decoloration ratio and saponin recovery ratios. Using response surface methodology, the correlation between the process parameters (i.e., sample volume and flow rate) and decoloration performance was modeled. A design space of the decoloration process was subsequently established through the proposed models. The verification experimental values were in good agreement with the predicted values. The design space was proven reliable, because all the verification experimental results attained the criteria for design space development. Moreover, most of the saponins adsorbed by the acidic alumina could be recovered through dynamic desorption using water and ethanol. The method developed in the current study is highly efficient, flexible, and easy to control, thus providing a promising approach for the decoloration of Panax notoginseng extracts with consistent decoloration performance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.