2011
DOI: 10.1002/qj.738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The definition of ‘truth’ for Numerical Weather Prediction error statistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantification of the loss of information as a result of suboptimal weighting, and implementation of efficient procedures to adjust the error covariance parameters to a configuration that improves the forecasts' skill, are areas of active research. Synergistic efforts include the development of error covariance models for NWP applications (Derber and Bouttier, 1999;Gaspari and Cohn, 1999;Lorenc, 2003;Fisher, 2003;Bannister, 2008aBannister, , 2008bFrehlich, 2011;Bishop et al, 2011;Raynaud et al, 2011) and of computationally feasible techniques for diagnosis, estimation, and tuning of the error covariance parameters (Wahba et al, 1995;Dee, 1995;Dee and Da Silva, 1999;Andersson et al, 2000;Desroziers and Ivanov, 2001;Cardinali et al, 2004;Buehner et al, 2005;Chapnik et al, 2006;Zupanski and Zupanski, 2006;Trémolet, 2007;Anderson, 2007;Liu and Kalnay, 2008;Desroziers et al, 2009;Li et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantification of the loss of information as a result of suboptimal weighting, and implementation of efficient procedures to adjust the error covariance parameters to a configuration that improves the forecasts' skill, are areas of active research. Synergistic efforts include the development of error covariance models for NWP applications (Derber and Bouttier, 1999;Gaspari and Cohn, 1999;Lorenc, 2003;Fisher, 2003;Bannister, 2008aBannister, , 2008bFrehlich, 2011;Bishop et al, 2011;Raynaud et al, 2011) and of computationally feasible techniques for diagnosis, estimation, and tuning of the error covariance parameters (Wahba et al, 1995;Dee, 1995;Dee and Da Silva, 1999;Andersson et al, 2000;Desroziers and Ivanov, 2001;Cardinali et al, 2004;Buehner et al, 2005;Chapnik et al, 2006;Zupanski and Zupanski, 2006;Trémolet, 2007;Anderson, 2007;Liu and Kalnay, 2008;Desroziers et al, 2009;Li et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) much like that of the algorithms in the ensemble post-processing and bias-correction literature (e.g. Glahn and Lowry, 1972;Raftery et al, 2005) in which climatological information is used to build relationships between forecasts and observations. As such, this new framework has shown how to properly include the information normally obtained from 'bias-correction' algorithms within the data assimilation system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, even if we could give the forecast model the true state, it would not produce the correct forecast evolution because of incorrectly specified parameters and altogether missing physics. Second, what exactly is the appropriate true state to give the forecast model as an initial condition is ambiguous given the fact that this model can only represent states that are 'smoothed', or said another way, truncated with respect to the truth (Frehlich, 2011). More on this notion will be presented in Sections 3 and 4.…”
Section: The Forecast Posteriormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations