Indigenous Rights in Scandinavia 2016
DOI: 10.4324/9781315588353-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Definition of a Sami Person in Finland and its Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This makes Finland the state with the most liberal approach on paper, but Norway is arguably more liberal in practice due to having an essentially trust-based registration process while the other states have mechanisms for screening and removing applicants (Berg-Nordlie, 2015). There have been intense public debates concerning SER entry criteria, particularly in Finland (Joona, 2015;Junka-Aikio 2016Laakso, 2016). In 2015, a former President of Finland's Sámediggi quit SER in protest over 93 persons being included in the registry against the Sámediggi's will (Heikki, 2015).…”
Section: Formal Criteria For Indigenous Ethnicity: the Case Of The Sámimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes Finland the state with the most liberal approach on paper, but Norway is arguably more liberal in practice due to having an essentially trust-based registration process while the other states have mechanisms for screening and removing applicants (Berg-Nordlie, 2015). There have been intense public debates concerning SER entry criteria, particularly in Finland (Joona, 2015;Junka-Aikio 2016Laakso, 2016). In 2015, a former President of Finland's Sámediggi quit SER in protest over 93 persons being included in the registry against the Sámediggi's will (Heikki, 2015).…”
Section: Formal Criteria For Indigenous Ethnicity: the Case Of The Sámimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of the Sámi, it is clear that the global discourse of indigeneity has affected the local indigenous political arena and created conflicts within Sámi societies The Consequences of Swedish National Law on Sámi Self-Constitution 295 (Valkonen, Valkonen, & Koivurova, 2017). While there has only been some discussions within Sámi society in Sweden and Norway about definitions connected to who is able to vote according to the Sámidiggi/Sámi Parliament Act, the debate in Finland has been intense and contentious (see Aikio & Åhrén, 2014;Joona, 2013Joona, , 2015Junka-Aikio, 2016;Nyssönen, 2015;Pettersen, 2017;Sarivaara, Uusiautti, & Määtää, 2013;Valkonen, Valkonen, & Koivurova, 2017). This debate, which have focused on the individual right to belong to an indigenous community vs the collective right of indigenous peoples to decide their own membership criteria, is reflected in the HRC's decisions toward Finland (CCPR/ C/124/D/2668/2015; CCPR/C/124/D/2950/2017).…”
Section: Self-constitution and Indigenous Peoplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defining indigenous identity locally has also engendered debates (e.g. Joona, 2015;Sturm, 2011;Valkonen, Valkonen, & Koivurova, 2016). Despite its general nature, 'indigeneity' serves to define indigenous peoples as a particular group globally and constitutes a political resource that they may draw on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%