“…In the context of the Sámi, it is clear that the global discourse of indigeneity has affected the local indigenous political arena and created conflicts within Sámi societies The Consequences of Swedish National Law on Sámi Self-Constitution 295 (Valkonen, Valkonen, & Koivurova, 2017). While there has only been some discussions within Sámi society in Sweden and Norway about definitions connected to who is able to vote according to the Sámidiggi/Sámi Parliament Act, the debate in Finland has been intense and contentious (see Aikio & Åhrén, 2014;Joona, 2013Joona, , 2015Junka-Aikio, 2016;Nyssönen, 2015;Pettersen, 2017;Sarivaara, Uusiautti, & Määtää, 2013;Valkonen, Valkonen, & Koivurova, 2017). This debate, which have focused on the individual right to belong to an indigenous community vs the collective right of indigenous peoples to decide their own membership criteria, is reflected in the HRC's decisions toward Finland (CCPR/ C/124/D/2668/2015; CCPR/C/124/D/2950/2017).…”