The Deficit View and Its Critics

Abstract

This paper investigates what it is to understand human differences in terms of deficits and examines criticisms of this approach. In the past few decades, across many fields of inquiry and outside the academy there has been a surge of interest in critiquing "the deficit view" of all manner of group differences and deviations from the norm. But what exactly is meant by "deficit view" and related terms when they figure in accounts of human differences? Do critics of the deficit view claim that they are never appropriate or that particular applications of the approach are inappropriate? The aim of this paper is twofold: to identify and articulate some of the conceptual issues at the heart of debates about deficit approaches and to examine how these issues matter. Autism is my focus case. As we will see, many critiques of the deficit view of autism tend to characterize what is problematic about taking a deficit view in terms of the personal and social harm that deficit views can or do effect. One important upshot of my discussion, I argue, is that there is another kind of drawback to deficit thinking that is independent of the deficit view's potential negative personal and social consequences, a drawback that deserves serious consideration and sustained critical attention: in some instances, at least, deficit views impede scientific and philosophical progress in our understanding of the phenomena themselves. Thus, articulating and assessing deficit approaches is of practical and theoretical importance.

Not Doing it Properly? (Re)producing and Resisting Knowledge Through Narratives of Autistic Sexualities

“…8 Among contributors challenging assumptions of autistic asexuality, some refer to sexuality as among the basic human needs, 9 a source of pleasure, and something which creates closeness to the person one loves, 10 a strategy for managing anxiety, 11 or a strong need associated with well-being. 12 Some contributors stress the connection between sexuality and longing for children, excluding asexuals from possibilities of parenthood. 13 A low sexual interest is associated with inner or external barriers, for example difficulties with certain bodily contact, 14 mental illness, 15 social isolation, 16 medication, 17 bad self-esteem, 18 'deviant sexuality' 19 and social/emotional difficulties with relationships.…”

“…The diagnostic criteria for autism laid out in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) revolve around deficits in social communication and interaction, and restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities [10], with '(O)bservation of aberrant behaviour' as the basis for diagnosis [11]. The literature concerned with autism largely follows a similar focus, taking as its basis a study of 'negatively valued deviations from behavioral norms' [12], and leaving the assumption of deficit in the areas detailed by the DSM largely unquestioned.…”

“Just My Being Here is Self-Advocacy”: Exploring the Self-Advocacy Experiences of Disabled Graduate Students of Color

“…Research on self-advocacy is frequently situated within a deficit framework (Dinishak, 2016), which argues that students frequently lack self-advocacy skills and require differentiated and remedial coaching by disability services professionals in order to be successful (Stamp et al, 2014;Vaccaro & Kimball, 2017). For example, Ju et al…”

From rehabilitation to ultrabilitation: moving forward

“…The key point here is that such understanding of the scope of rehabilitation arises from the common portrayal of disability as a deficit to repair [6] by returning to, and maintaining, baseline levels of functioning to the greatest extent possible. These levels indicate the range considered normal for people in their particular situation [2,7].…”