2014
DOI: 10.1080/11663081.2014.911540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The defective conditional in mathematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Moreover, properties such as contraposition and transitivity, which are invalid for the variably strict conditional but valid for the strict conditional, seem to be essential to many inferences routinely used in reasoning. After three decades in which the Stalnaker-Lewis theory was viewed as the standard analysis of conditionals, the strict conditional started to gain attention again [12,13,18,19,27,32,33,74,77,78,81]. 4 The third view of conditionals discussed by Sextus Empiricus, which has been attributed to Chrysippus, states that a conditional is true when the contradictory of the consequent is incompatible with the antecedent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Moreover, properties such as contraposition and transitivity, which are invalid for the variably strict conditional but valid for the strict conditional, seem to be essential to many inferences routinely used in reasoning. After three decades in which the Stalnaker-Lewis theory was viewed as the standard analysis of conditionals, the strict conditional started to gain attention again [12,13,18,19,27,32,33,74,77,78,81]. 4 The third view of conditionals discussed by Sextus Empiricus, which has been attributed to Chrysippus, states that a conditional is true when the contradictory of the consequent is incompatible with the antecedent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of the above valuation is to afford a stronger characterization of it; stronger, in the sense that some of the theorems where the material implication of classical logic essentially occurs do not hold in AR 4 . Our logical constant is a case of "defective" conditional [14], which means that the logical relation cannot be satisfied unless the antecedent is said true or, equivalently, accepted by the speaker. Such a feature cancels any form of the highly counterintuitive paradoxes of material implication, by virtue of which the whole relation holds once the antecedent is false.…”
Section: Strong Conditionalmentioning
confidence: 99%