2019
DOI: 10.1142/s0219498819500270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dedekind different of a Cayley–Bacharach scheme

Abstract: Given a 0-dimensional scheme X in a projective space P n K over a field K, we characterize the Cayley-Bacharach property of X in terms of the algebraic structure of the Dedekind different of its homogeneous coordinate ring. Moreover, we characterize Cayley-Bacharach schemes by Dedekind's formula for the conductor and the complementary module, we study schemes with minimal Dedekind different using the trace of the complementary module, and we prove various results about almost Gorenstein and nearly Gorenstein s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the special case that X is a locally Gorenstein Cayley-Bacharach scheme, the regularity index of the Dedekind different attains the maximal value. This also follows from [14,Proposition 4.8] with a different proof. Corollary 4.9.…”
Section: Bound the Hilbert Function Of The Dedekind Differentmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the special case that X is a locally Gorenstein Cayley-Bacharach scheme, the regularity index of the Dedekind different attains the maximal value. This also follows from [14,Proposition 4.8] with a different proof. Corollary 4.9.…”
Section: Bound the Hilbert Function Of The Dedekind Differentmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Later investigations of the Cayley-Bacharach property have included the work of Fouli, Polini, and Ulrich [6], Robbiano [17], Gold, Little, and Schenck [8], and Guardo [10]. Moreover, this property has also been extended for 0-dimensional schemes in P n K (see [14][15][16]21]). When X ⊆ P n K is a 0-dimensional scheme over an algebraically closed field K, Robbiano and the first author [17] considered subschemes of X of degree deg(X) − 1 to show that the conditions (a) and (c) of Theorem 1.1 are still equivalent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, nearly Gorenstein rings, which are the object of interest of this paper, have been introduced even more recently by Herzog et al (2019) in 2019, although their defining property was already examined by Ding (1993), Huneke and Vraciu (2006), and Striuli and Vraciu (2011). Moreover, nearly Gorenstein rings have been studied in several contexts, such as zero-dimensional schemes (Kreuzer et al 2019), affine semigroup rings Herzog et al (2019), and affine monomial curves Moscariello (2020). See also Endo et al (2020), Dao et al (2020), Kobayashi (2020), Kumashiro (2020), Rahimi (2020) for other related results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, nearly Gorenstein rings, which are the object of interest of this paper, have been introduced even more recently by Herzog, Hibi, and Stamate [HHS19] in 2019. Nevertheless, they have already been studied in several contexts, such as zero-dimensional schemes [KLL19], affine semigroup rings [HJS19], and affine monomial curves [MS20]. See also [EGI19,DKT20,Kob20,Rah20] for other related results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%