2013
DOI: 10.1175/wcas-d-12-00040.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Decreasing Population Bias in Tornado Reports across the Central Plains

Abstract: Tornado–hazard assessment is hampered by a population bias in the available data. Here, the authors demonstrate a way to statistically quantify this bias using the ratio of city to country report densities. The expected report densities come from a model of the number of reports as a function of distance from the nearest city center. On average since 1950, reports near cities with populations of at least 1000 in a 5.5° latitude × 5.5° longitude region centered on Russell, Kansas, exceed those in the country by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, urban properties can be as vulnerable as the weakest in their immediate vicinity and damage levels have some dependence on building density. However, the similar tornado severity distributions between smaller cities and very rural areas implied by the data in Elsner et al (2013), and mentioned above, suggest that debris loading may not be a factor between these two contrasting areas. Published estimates of the contribution of missiles to total tornado damage do not exist, because it is difficult to distinguish the contribution due to engineering or construction aspects from those due to complex tornadic wind fields.…”
Section: Stronger Tornadoes In Metro Areasmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this way, urban properties can be as vulnerable as the weakest in their immediate vicinity and damage levels have some dependence on building density. However, the similar tornado severity distributions between smaller cities and very rural areas implied by the data in Elsner et al (2013), and mentioned above, suggest that debris loading may not be a factor between these two contrasting areas. Published estimates of the contribution of missiles to total tornado damage do not exist, because it is difficult to distinguish the contribution due to engineering or construction aspects from those due to complex tornadic wind fields.…”
Section: Stronger Tornadoes In Metro Areasmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Their results indicate that touchdown densities in the most rural parts are statistically indistinguishable from smaller cities in their latest 2002-2011 period for F0, F1 and F2+ categories. Taking into account that Elsner et al (2013) study a much larger contrast and much lower values of population densities than used here, their results are a strong indication of little differential in missing tornadoes between metro and non-metro areas in this analysis. In summary, the evidence indicates that missed tornadoes explain little of the raised tornado frequency in metro areas.…”
Section: Increased Total Tornado Occurrence In Metro Areasmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is not the case in general as a single thunderstorm can spawn a cluster of tornadoes over a compact area [9]. In addition, tornado reports tend to be more numerous near cities as compared to rural areas but this spatial variation is decreasing with time [10]. Improvements in observing practices over time tend to result in more tornado reports, especially reports of weak tornadoes [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%