2010
DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aap029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Decoupling of Farm Programs: Revisiting the Wealth Effect

Abstract: Recent reforms of agricultural policies in developed countries have introduced direct payments as replacements for traditional production‐enhancing instruments. Whereas these new instruments can, in principle, influence production through several channels, current empirical studies show no significant impact on production; direct payments mainly increase land values. In this article, we revisit the evaluation of the coupling effects passing through the wealth of agricultural households. The initial wealth of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sckokai and Moro, 2009), and land (e.g. Féménia et al. , 2010) decisions among many other topics and highlights several transmission channels (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sckokai and Moro, 2009), and land (e.g. Féménia et al. , 2010) decisions among many other topics and highlights several transmission channels (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chau and Gorter (2005) proved that decoupled payments provide the opportunity to some agricultural holdings to remain in business, without being able to gain profits, by using part of these payments to cover production costs. A different approach regarding managing practices of farms is mentioned by Femenia et al (2010). According to this, the single payment scheme encourages a prosperity effect which diversifies farmers' attitude towards risk, which leads to production responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farm policies in the US and EU have reduced their distorting impact on world markets and farmers' decisions at the margin. They have known, and mostly small, effects on exit decisions, credit constraints and risk‐taking (Bureau and Gohin, ; Féménia et al ., ; Viaggi et al ., ; and Bhaskar and Beghin, , for a review). Farm policies remain sizeable in terms of the implicit transfers to farmers, and are relatively larger in the EU than in the US as a share of farm receipts.…”
Section: Policy Contextmentioning
confidence: 98%