The Decline of Defense Counsel and the Rise of Accuracy in Criminal Adjudication

Brown, Darryl K.

doi:10.2139/ssrn.689161

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Brown, 2005 Brown, at 1611 Turner, 2006 at 212-23. 35 For a more thorough discussion of this concern with error allocation, see, for example,Stacy, 1991Stacy, , at 1406 …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth

Turner¹

2019

Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter discusses U.S. constitutional law surrounding the admissibility of confessions and the contexts in which the law demands exclusion and those in which a cost-benefit analysis by the court results in its inclusion. Justifications and practical effects of exclusionary rules and the public debates surrounding their use are explained. In the U.S., rights that are expressly protected by the Constitution-such as the right to remain silent, the right to be free from an unreasonable search or seizure, and the right to counsel-are weighed more heavily than the state's need to fully explore the facts in a criminal case. The values of fairness, dignity, privacy, and liberty embodied in these rights frequently outweigh the need for reliable fact finding. In deciding how to enforce these constitutional rights, however, U.S. courts are well aware of competing interests throughout the criminal justice system.

show abstract

“…Brown, 2005 Brown, at 1611 Turner, 2006 at 212-23. 35 For a more thorough discussion of this concern with error allocation, see, for example,Stacy, 1991Stacy, , at 1406 …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%