2022
DOI: 10.1080/0951192x.2022.2081359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The decision-making framework for assembly tasks planning in human–robot collaborated manufacturing system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation ( 6) ensures that at any given time, the number of production orders processed by the same process does not exceed the number of machines available for that process. Finally, equation (7) establishes that the next production order can only be selected after the previous production order has selected its machine.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equation ( 6) ensures that at any given time, the number of production orders processed by the same process does not exceed the number of machines available for that process. Finally, equation (7) establishes that the next production order can only be selected after the previous production order has selected its machine.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems offer advantages such as easier access to updated drawings, the ability to quickly share changes or corrections, and improved collaboration among different parts of the manufacturing team. Reasonable task allocation methods can optimize the allocation of production resources, thereby significantly improving the economic and social benefits of enterprises [6][7][8][9]. With the increasing level of informatization and automation, the intelligent distribution of manufacturing drawings has become an inevitable trend.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The service districts served by service stations 1, 50, 12, and 122, are not contiguous, and service units 39, 40, 137, and 171 are served by the corresponding service stations across other service districts. In reality, the cross-regional maintenance service shown in Figure 8 is not generally a feasible solution in agriculture, which results in a long service latency and resource waste [5]. In agriculture, the decision-maker may prefer to assign these service units to the nearest service stations, such as allocating service unit 39 to service station 50, service unit 40 to service station 43, service unit 137 to service station 138, and service unit 171 to service station 173.…”
Section: Analysis Of Contiguity Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agricultural machinery is prone to failure due to high temperatures, complicated environments, and long-term agricultural operations, especially in the busy season [2,3]. To maintain stable production in agriculture, manufacturers always design a maintenance service network to supply maintenance for failed machinery [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To guarantee a high level of flexibility in the planning and execution of collaborative tasks, we deploy a hierarchical Task and Motion Planning framework that allows for online planning of the robot trajectories according to the user and the environment's state. This is key to ensuring a smooth collaboration between the human and the robot because the robot's tasks can be robust with respect to changes in objects and tools' positions, and the robot's movement can be optimized to avoid interference with the user's activities [40].…”
Section: Integrated Task and Motion Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%