1963
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5582(63)90508-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The decay scheme of Yb166

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uncertainty of the relative intensity of the 82.3 keV gamma transition is missing in [30]. In [32,33] the I(Tm K X-ray)/I(82.3 keV) ratio is given (8.68 ± 0.21 and 8.17 ± 0.23, respectively), the weighted average of these data (8.44 ± 0.27) together with the known X-ray intensities taken from [30] were used to calculate the value given in Table 2. The agreement between the cross sections based on the counting of the 82.3 keV and the 80.6 keV γ rays where always within 3.4%.…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The uncertainty of the relative intensity of the 82.3 keV gamma transition is missing in [30]. In [32,33] the I(Tm K X-ray)/I(82.3 keV) ratio is given (8.68 ± 0.21 and 8.17 ± 0.23, respectively), the weighted average of these data (8.44 ± 0.27) together with the known X-ray intensities taken from [30] were used to calculate the value given in Table 2. The agreement between the cross sections based on the counting of the 82.3 keV and the 80.6 keV γ rays where always within 3.4%.…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is indicated, too. Decay parameters of the 162 Er(α,γ)166 Yb and 162 Er(α,n)165 Yb (which decays by electron-capture to 165 Tm) reaction products taken from the literature[30,31] and calculated (marked with *) using the I(Tm K X-ray)/I(82.3 keV) ratio, available from[32,33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%