1983
DOI: 10.1016/0167-5087(83)90470-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The decay scheme of 64Cu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in the figure, with the exception of Ref. [47], all of these measurements agree well with each other. The apparent deviation of the AME1995 mass excess is due to a change of almost 4 keV in the mass excess of 64 Cu between 1995 and today.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in the figure, with the exception of Ref. [47], all of these measurements agree well with each other. The apparent deviation of the AME1995 mass excess is due to a change of almost 4 keV in the mass excess of 64 Cu between 1995 and today.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…The mass of the stable 64 Zn was previously determined mainly by a measurement of the negatron energy spectrum in the radioactive decay of 64 Cu (T 1/2 = 12.7 h) (1983Ch47 [47]). Radioactive copper was obtained by irradiating a high-purity metallic Cu sample of natural isotopic composition at a nuclear reactor, and the β spectrum was then recorded with the doublefocusing spectrometer at the National Physical Laboratory in Teddington (UK).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This reaction is insensitive to low-energy neutrons because of its high-threshold energy. The 64 Cu activity was identified and measured by detecting gamma rays of 1345.8 keV with a known intensity (I γ = 0.471 ± 0.011% per decay) [13].…”
Section: Neutron Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Determinação das probabilidades de emissão gama por decaimento destes radionuclídeos por meio de medidas absolutas e em espectrômetro de HPGe calibrado. (CHRISTMAS et al, 1983;KAWADA, 1986) como os mais recentes (QAIM, et al, 2007;WANKE et al;LUCA, et al, 2012;AMIOT, et al, 2012;SAHAGIA, et al, 2012;BÉ, et al, 2012;HAVELKA and SOCHOROVÁ , 2014;PIBIDA et al, 2017) (VOLKERT et al, 1991;NIJSEN et al, 2001;BREITZ et al, 2006;COSTA, 2008;LIBERAL, 2013;RANJBAR et al, 2015;ZOLGHADRI et al, 2015;TEHRANI, 2016 (OKUNO e YOSHIMURA, 2010;KRANE, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified