1970
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.29.539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Decay of 144Ce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coincidences from detector combinations with angles 8 2 120" were discarded. With these precautions taken, the zero-field data gave the result A 2 = -0.172 (12) and A, =0.021(34). The A, coefficient is zero within the error limits thus giving no indication of any scattering effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coincidences from detector combinations with angles 8 2 120" were discarded. With these precautions taken, the zero-field data gave the result A 2 = -0.172 (12) and A, =0.021(34). The A, coefficient is zero within the error limits thus giving no indication of any scattering effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that the present value and the revised value of Subba Rao are in good agreement with the theoretical values for pure El transitions. 1 "iR D. Relative Intensities of the 104-, 142-and 246-keV Gamma Rays in Eu The relative intensities of the 104-, 142-and 245-keV gamma rays from 155 the decay of 22 minute Sm have been reported with values differing by 45 percent and with errors of 10 percent or more(68)(69)(70)(71)(72)(73). The present in vestigation was undertaken to determine accurately the relative intensity of these gamma rays so they may be used to obtain the internal conversion coef ficients for these transitions.155 Analysis of the Eu gamma-ray spectrum 155 155 The level structure in the nucleus Eu following the decay of Sm is shown inFigure 33(32, p. 5-5-51, 1963).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%