2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2010.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Debate over Re-Licensing the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean value of the cost of dismantling, based on the example of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant, is US$21bn (Watts et al , 2010). However, the amount given so far at a discount of 1.05 −15 =1/2.08 = 0.48 the value of the cost of dismantling and waste management will be 21*0.48 = US$10.1bn (₴282.8bn).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean value of the cost of dismantling, based on the example of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant, is US$21bn (Watts et al , 2010). However, the amount given so far at a discount of 1.05 −15 =1/2.08 = 0.48 the value of the cost of dismantling and waste management will be 21*0.48 = US$10.1bn (₴282.8bn).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main exception to this trend is the widely-studied German energiewende (energy transition), which included a phaseout of nuclear energy (Johnstone and Stirling, 2020; Pegels and Lütkenhorst, 2014; Ramana and Delumeau, 2020). This article builds on existing studies of nuclear shutdown in geographical political economy (Greco and Yamamoto, 2019; Watts, 2012; Watts et al, 2010), highlighting the need to examine devaluation as an element of transitions that affects assets beyond the fossil fuel sector, resulting from the interactions of diverse political pressures and the changing economics of energy sources. In light of the contentious debate regarding the place of nuclear in climate mitigation strategies, further empirical research is necessary into the political economic forces affecting existing nuclear assets’ prospects across contexts.…”
Section: Justice and Devaluation In Energy Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%