2020
DOI: 10.1002/asi.24367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“The dearest of our possessions”: Applying Floridi's information privacy concept in models of information behavior and information literacy

Abstract: This conceptual article argues for the value of an approach to privacy in the digital information environment informed by Luciano Floridi's philosophy of information and information ethics. This approach involves achieving informational privacy, through the features of anonymity and obscurity, through an optimal balance of ontological frictions. This approach may be used to modify models for information behavior and for information literacy, giving them a fuller and more effective coverage of privacy issues in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be extended by adding the following privacy interests and concerns for biobanks and repositories: physical privacy (example may include gathering and storing biospecimen and testing them without consent), informational privacy (such as possible misuse of information), decisional privacy (e.g., control or influence over what is done with brain data and biospecimens), and proprietary privacy (e.g., ownership of biospecimens, datasets from brain repositories and the control of identity). Floridi [ 124 , 125 ] offers a similar typology but argues that informational privacy is central. This shows that there are different perceptions of privacy which can influence privacy practices in relation to managing brain data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be extended by adding the following privacy interests and concerns for biobanks and repositories: physical privacy (example may include gathering and storing biospecimen and testing them without consent), informational privacy (such as possible misuse of information), decisional privacy (e.g., control or influence over what is done with brain data and biospecimens), and proprietary privacy (e.g., ownership of biospecimens, datasets from brain repositories and the control of identity). Floridi [ 124 , 125 ] offers a similar typology but argues that informational privacy is central. This shows that there are different perceptions of privacy which can influence privacy practices in relation to managing brain data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Floridi's work (e.g. Floridi, 2014;Mittelstadt et al, 2016) has received great recognition and acclaim among information science researchers, including Fyffe (2015), Wang (2018), and Bawden and Robinson (2020). Among the many important ideas lent by Floridi to information science is an ethical philosophy of data and artificial intelligence.…”
Section: Perspectives On Data Science Bias and Ethics Within Informat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to ethical aspects in information literacy, Bawden and Robinson (2020) examine the possible incorporation of the concept of privacy as proposed by Floridi into information literacy. In reviewing existing information literacy frameworks, they indicate that more recent frameworks increasingly deal with ethical aspects of information literacy.…”
Section: Information Literacy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In metaliteracy, privacy is listed as one of the elements that people should be aware of when interacting with information. These literacy frameworks may not yet treat privacy of groups but there is a potential for incorporation (Bawden & Robinson 2020, pp. 1039-1040.…”
Section: Information Literacy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%