“…Various factors exacerbate ethnic cleavages and result in inter-group violence, including the economic disparities between ethnic communities (Fjelde & Østby, 2014;Gurr, 2000;Pierskalla & Sacks, 2017;Stewart, 2008); self-interested political entrepreneurs who mobilize ethnic identities-the instrumentalist argument-particularly around election periods (Brass, 1997;Gagnon, 1994;Posner, 2004); and ethnic favouritism or weak mechanisms of inclusion at the national level (Miguel, 2004). In contrast, ideational or constructivist theories emphasize that work focusing on material interests and political entrepreneurs is incomplete if it does not consider how ascriptive or cultural identities and their symbolic markers shape and constrain mobilization (Brubaker & Laitin, 1998;Horowitz, 2001;Kaufman, 2001). The middle ground in this debate recognizes that identity can be strategically mobilized, but also rooted in salient local identity narratives (e.g.…”