2014
DOI: 10.12785/amis/080242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The DEA Game Cross-efficiency Model for Supplier Selection Problem under Competition

Abstract: Abstract:As the most important responsibility of purchasing management, the problem of supplier evaluation and selection has always received a great deal of attention from practitioners and researchers. This management decision is a challenge due to the complexity and various criteria involved. Many methods based on data envelopment analysis(DEA) emerged, especially the cross efficiency. But it exists some limitations, such as the cross efficiency value is often non-unique, average cross efficiency measure is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed second DEA model as reported in Ma et al, variable returns to scale assumption (Banker, Charnes, and Cooper [BCC]) also coined from the first names of the proposers, accounted for the component of the scale efficiency, thereby making it easier for processes examined in regions of increasing, constant, and decreasing returns to scale. CCR model can determine CCR efficiency in both primal and dual modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed second DEA model as reported in Ma et al, variable returns to scale assumption (Banker, Charnes, and Cooper [BCC]) also coined from the first names of the proposers, accounted for the component of the scale efficiency, thereby making it easier for processes examined in regions of increasing, constant, and decreasing returns to scale. CCR model can determine CCR efficiency in both primal and dual modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The game cross-model has recently been applied in performance evaluations such as those for suppliers (Ma et al 2014), Olympic ranking (Roboredo et al 2015), public infrastructure investment (Sun et al 2016) and portfolio selection (Essid et al 2018), as it is precise and discriminating in its efficiency estimation.…”
Section: Methodology and Research Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A factor that possibly reduces the usefulness of the cross‐efficiency evaluation is that cross‐efficiency scores may not be unique due to the presence of alternative optima, thus requiring the introduction of a secondary objective function (Zohrehbandian and Sadeghi Gavgani, ). Another way to avoid the possibility of not finding a Pareto solution is represented by the game cross‐efficiency proposed by Ma et al (). The classical DEA approach and its cross‐efficiency extension are extensively described in Section .…”
Section: Supplier Selection Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%