2016
DOI: 10.1177/1365480216651519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The datafication of early years education and its impact upon pedagogy

Abstract: This paper raises important questions about whether the increasing control of early years education through performance data is genuinely a means for school improvement. This composite article, based upon the previously published work of Roberts-Holmes (2015) and Roberts-Holmes and Bradbury (2016), examines the pervasiveness of attainment data in early years education professional activity, its impact on early years teachers' consciousness and identity, and the narrowing and instrumentalisation of early years … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What Lingard et al (2013) terms ‘datafication’, governing through numerical data, is increasingly apparent (Roberts-Holmes, 2014), made more potent when linked to the introduction, since 2013, of performance-related pay for teachers. Large-scale, national evaluative studies, positivistic in character, have been funded to add yet further oversight and to provide evidence on most effective technologies – ‘what works’.…”
Section: Discourses Of Control In Early Childhood Education: the Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…What Lingard et al (2013) terms ‘datafication’, governing through numerical data, is increasingly apparent (Roberts-Holmes, 2014), made more potent when linked to the introduction, since 2013, of performance-related pay for teachers. Large-scale, national evaluative studies, positivistic in character, have been funded to add yet further oversight and to provide evidence on most effective technologies – ‘what works’.…”
Section: Discourses Of Control In Early Childhood Education: the Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ball et al 2012 ; Ozga 2009 ). This focus on testing and performance is generally at odds with primary school cultures in England which have traditionally emphasised play, pastoral care and creative expression (Roberts-Holmes and Bradbury 2016 ). Working at a counterpoint to these policy and pedagogical tensions are material threats to schools, with the possibility of government intervention and new management impositions if they do not meet benchmark standards, with SATs data being one of the indicators Ofsted 1 use to rate the ‘quality’ of schools during inspection visits.…”
Section: Testing Pressure and Standardised Language Benchmarks In Enmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broad phases of development described in this document outlined expected developmental norms for an age-related phase, such as 30–50 months. Broad phases of learning were found by the creators of many online tracking systems to lack the level of detail required to track the minutiae of child progress over time, so each broad phase was broken down into smaller steps to fabricate a more specific norm (Roberts-Holmes and Bradbury, 2016).…”
Section: Policy Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the child is reconstituted in data. The data other, which has been created for each child in the form of this corpus of data, is scrutinised, compared and polished to create the ideal version of the child needed for accountability purposes (Roberts-Holmes and Bradbury, 2016). Hierarchisation is crucial as it identifies those who may possibly reach the GLD.…”
Section: Normalising Judgementmentioning
confidence: 99%