2018
DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dat Project, an open and decentralized research data tool

Abstract: Today’s scientific data are primarily stored and accessed via centralized Web-based infrastructure. Centralization has advantages but also carries risks such as link rot and content drift, which can hinder scientific progress. It is time to ask whether traditional, centralized Web architecture aligns with scholarly priorities and values, and to collaboratively move towards new approaches that do.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed design for decentralized, verified, provenance based modular communication on the Dat protocol fulfills a wide conceptualization of the functions of a scholarly communications system from library and information sciences (Roosendaal and Geurts 1998;Sompel et al 2004). Due to more modular and continuous communication, it is more difficult to selectively register results when the preceding steps have publicly been registered already.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed design for decentralized, verified, provenance based modular communication on the Dat protocol fulfills a wide conceptualization of the functions of a scholarly communications system from library and information sciences (Roosendaal and Geurts 1998;Sompel et al 2004). Due to more modular and continuous communication, it is more difficult to selectively register results when the preceding steps have publicly been registered already.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chapter 9 extends this new form of scholarly communication in its technical foundations and contextualizes it in the library-and information sciences (LIS). From LIS, five key functions of a scholarly communication system emerge: registration, certification, preservation, awareness, and incentives (Roosendaal and Geurts 1998;Sompel et al 2004). First, I extend how the article-based scholarly communication system takes a narrow and unsatisfactory approach to the five functions.…”
Section: Prologuementioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Open data – data that can be freely used, reused and redistributed by anyone – is driven by the digitization of information into an easily sharable form. While the technical aspects of this process have improved dramatically over the past decade 13 , many scientific fields have yet to establish an open data standard 4 . This lack of consensus has been particularly troubling for the systematics community, which increasingly relies on digital imaging techniques like X-ray computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to visualize and compare biological forms (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%