2016
DOI: 10.1080/1461670x.2016.1181528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dash for Gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, researchers have extended the NAS model to the arena of agenda building and found that public relations campaign messages could to some degree shape the media agenda in terms of network connections (e.g., Kiousis et al, 2015; Neil et al, 2016). In the context of intermedia agenda setting, a networked perspective suggests that the network salience of issues and attributes in one type of media will influence the network salience in another.…”
Section: Nas Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, researchers have extended the NAS model to the arena of agenda building and found that public relations campaign messages could to some degree shape the media agenda in terms of network connections (e.g., Kiousis et al, 2015; Neil et al, 2016). In the context of intermedia agenda setting, a networked perspective suggests that the network salience of issues and attributes in one type of media will influence the network salience in another.…”
Section: Nas Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding external stakeholders, previous research states that the general population is critical about the communication/PR field, but not as much as they are about journalists as traditional gatekeepers [8]. The constructivist process of mediated content between PR and news media has been researched in public relations from the agenda building and framing perspectives, i.e., [59,60].…”
Section: Trust In the Pr/communication Professional Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political public relations is defined as "the management process by which an actor for political purposes, through communication and action, seeks to influence and to establish, build, and maintain beneficial relationships and reputations with key publics and stakeholders to help support its mission and achieve its goals" (Strömbäck & Kiousis, 2011, p. 8). Such actors can include governments (Albishri et al, 2019), state-owned media (Zhang et al, 2017), political candidates (Kim et al, 2011), political parties (Aras, 2018), interest groups (Neil et al, 2016), corporate CEOs (Lan et al, 2020), and even citizens (Krishna et al, 2020). Those actors are crucial in recognizing the key stakeholders and issues and how they are framed in media coverage and public discourse (Lan et al, 2020).…”
Section: Political Public Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first and second levels of agenda building focus on salience transfer of individual objects and attributes, while the third level, or the network agenda, focuses on the bundling of issues and/or attributes and their subsequent packaged transfer to the media agenda that contribute to the perception of linkages among different objects or attributes (Guo & McCombs, 2011;Vargo & Guo, 2017). Research into network agenda building is relatively limited with little qualitative data (e.g., Albishri et al, 2019;Kiousis et al, 2015;Neil et al, 2016;Yang & Saffer, 2018;Zhang et al, 2017). Several of these studies found supporting evidence for the cooccurrence of attributes in information subsidies and the news coverage.…”
Section: Network Agenda Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%