The dark side of going abroad: How broad foreign experiences increase immoral behavior.

Abstract

Because of the unprecedented pace of globalization, foreign experiences are increasingly common and valued. Past research has focused on the benefits of foreign experiences, including enhanced creativity and reduced intergroup bias. In contrast, the present work uncovers a potential dark side of foreign experiences: increased immoral behavior. We propose that broad foreign experiences (i.e., experiences in multiple foreign countries) foster not only cognitive flexibility but also moral flexibility. Using multiple methods (longitudinal, correlational, and experimental), 8 studies (N > 2,200) establish that broad foreign experiences can lead to immoral behavior by increasing moral relativism-the belief that morality is relative rather than absolute. The relationship between broad foreign experiences and immoral behavior was robust across a variety of cultural populations (anglophone, francophone), life stages (high school students, university students, MBA students, middle-aged adults), and 7 different measures of immorality. As individuals are exposed to diverse cultures, their moral compass may lose some of its precision. (PsycINFO Database Record

The Grateful Don’t Cheat: Gratitude as a Fount of Virtue

“…As such, this measure of cheating was similar in design to others that have been frequently employed (cf. Lu et al, 2017;Lu, Lee, Gino, & Galinsky, 2018).…”

Relativism or tolerance? Defining, assessing, connecting, and distinguishing two moral personality features with prominent roles in modern societies

“…Given its importance, moral relativism has attracted empirical attention from personality researchers. Research suggests that individuals with high scores on currently available scales of moral relativism are more open to experience, more politically liberal, less dogmatic, and less likely to endorse a variety of religious beliefs than are non‐relativists (Davis, Andersen, & Curtis, ; Iyer, Koleva, Graham, Ditto, & Haidt, ; Lu et al, ; Yilmaz & Bahçekapili, ). In addition, those scoring high on these scales tend to value independence, excitement, accomplishment, beauty, and pleasure, and they tend to place relatively less value on honesty, family security, national security, and self‐respect (Rim, ).…”

“…In addition, those scoring high on these scales tend to value independence, excitement, accomplishment, beauty, and pleasure, and they tend to place relatively less value on honesty, family security, national security, and self‐respect (Rim, ). Research utilizing these scales presents a particularly negative picture of relativism, suggesting that moral relativists have higher levels of psychopathic traits and are more inclined toward immoral intentions as well as diverse types of immoral behavior (e.g., Bass, Barnett, & Brown, ; Cohen, Panter, Turan, Morse, & Kim, ; Douglas & Wier, ; Glenn, Iyer, Graham, Koleva, & Haidt, ; Kish‐Gephart, Harrison, & Treviño, ; Lu et al, ).…”

“Switching On” Creativity: Task Switching Increases Creativity by Reducing Cognitive Fixation

“…In a similar vein, cognitive fixation is considered a barrier to solving problems that require convergent thinking. For instance, the classic convergent thinking task, the Remote Associates Test (RAT; Lu et al, 2017;Mednick, 1962), presents three cue words and asks the subject to conceive a fourth word that is associated with each of the three words (e.g., cue words: cheese, blood, print; solution: blue). The RAT can be challenging because people may first think of and fixate on a non-solution word that is strongly associated with just one of the cues (e.g., cheese-cake; bloodred; print-ink) instead of a word that is commonly associated with all three of them (Smith & Blankenship, 1991;Storm & Angello, 2010).…”