2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2022.101829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dangers of using diagnoses outside of established psychiatric nosology in the courtroom: Analysis and discussion of current Swiss legal precedent from a medical perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These patients were ordered to partake in a therapeutic measure as part of their sanction or by the correctional authorities. In the Swiss forensic system, offenders can be treated under a therapeutic measure per Article 59 (inpatient treatment), Article 63 (outpatient treatment), or on a voluntary basis [for more details see ( 29 )]. At the BFOC, treatment sessions are conducted by forensic psychiatrists and psychologists; social workers may provide additional support, but they do not engage in psychotherapeutic treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients were ordered to partake in a therapeutic measure as part of their sanction or by the correctional authorities. In the Swiss forensic system, offenders can be treated under a therapeutic measure per Article 59 (inpatient treatment), Article 63 (outpatient treatment), or on a voluntary basis [for more details see ( 29 )]. At the BFOC, treatment sessions are conducted by forensic psychiatrists and psychologists; social workers may provide additional support, but they do not engage in psychotherapeutic treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The political abuse of psychiatry (i.e., punitive psychiatry) involves the misuse of diagnostic procedures and coercive treatment to marginalise civil dissent and impose social controls. 1 , 2 , 3 Past instances of punitive psychiatry have been documented throughout the former Soviet Union, China, Eastern Europe, South America, and other jurisdictions. 1 The 2022 invasion of Ukraine has coincided with an alarming resurgence of these practices in the Russian Federation to suppress anti-war opposition, 3 , 4 , 5 eliciting minimal condemnation from the global medical community.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%