2013
DOI: 10.1038/nmat3517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cytoplasm of living cells behaves as a poroelastic material

Abstract: The cytoplasm is the largest part of the cell by volume and hence its rheology sets the rate at which cellular shape changes can occur. Recent experimental evidence suggests that cytoplasmic rheology can be described by a poroelastic model, in which the cytoplasm is treated as a biphasic material consisting of a porous elastic solid meshwork (cytoskeleton, organelles, macromolecules) bathed in an interstitial fluid (cytosol). In this picture, the rate of cellular deformation is limited by the rate at which int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

44
584
3
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 569 publications
(660 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
44
584
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Order-of-magnitude calculations based on estimated pore sizes suggest that if the worm were a simple cylindrical biopolymeric hydrogel, hydrostatic pressure would equilibrate over the relatively slow timescales of the experiment (see the Supporting Material); this corresponds to the so-called drained limit in the literature on poroelasticity, and is consistent with the rate-independence of the data (Fig. 4) (40,41). But, if the pressure inside the worm were to equal that on the outside, why should the worm deform at all?…”
Section: Using Hydrostatic Pressure To Probe C Elegans Mechanicssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Order-of-magnitude calculations based on estimated pore sizes suggest that if the worm were a simple cylindrical biopolymeric hydrogel, hydrostatic pressure would equilibrate over the relatively slow timescales of the experiment (see the Supporting Material); this corresponds to the so-called drained limit in the literature on poroelasticity, and is consistent with the rate-independence of the data (Fig. 4) (40,41). But, if the pressure inside the worm were to equal that on the outside, why should the worm deform at all?…”
Section: Using Hydrostatic Pressure To Probe C Elegans Mechanicssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…4 B). The independence of the modulus from the stress rate over the experimentally accessible timescales suggests that the transport of water within the worm's body (and thus equilibration of pressure) is not a limiting factor in the deformation; this is consistent with calculations of the expected timescale for poroelastic effects, t~10 À2 s, suggesting that any hydrodynamic draining occurs very quickly (see the Supporting Material) (40,41).…”
Section: Worms Expand Under Negative Applied Pressuresupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Indeed, in another study, a millisecond-timescale platform measured higher cellular stiffness values than did AFM, which typically involves measurements on the timescale of seconds (59). In the future, it would be valuable to measure bead or cellular mechanical properties across various timescales within the same device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, during invasion into tissues, tumor cells use actomyosin activity to squeeze through tight interstitial spaces (5). During these processes, the cell size, rheological properties and the geometric parameters associated with the extracellular environment dictate the maximal rate at which the cell can transmigrate and change its shape (6,7). The nucleus, being the largest and the stiffest organelle within the cell, is a physical constraint to migration and may be a rate-limiting factor for cellular deformations during cell migration through three-dimensional (3D) constrictions that are smaller or comparable to the nuclear cross section (8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%