2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijms19092699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cutaneous Microbiome and Wounds: New Molecular Targets to Promote Wound Healing

Abstract: The ecological community of microorganisms in/on humans, termed the microbiome, is vital for sustaining homeostasis. While culture-independent techniques have revealed the role of the gut microbiome in human health and disease, the role of the cutaneous microbiome in wound healing is less defined. Skin commensals are essential in the maintenance of the epithelial barrier function, regulation of the host immune system, and protection from invading pathogenic microorganisms. In this review, we summarize the lite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
129
0
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
1
129
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be stressed, however, that these animals have a thinner epidermis and dermis compared to humans, thus bringing into question suitability of such an animal model. On the other hand, experiments on large animals, such as pigs, whose skin has been regarded as the closest surrogate to human skin with regard to similarities in structure and healing, have a disadvantage of extensive costs, handling, and lack of genetic manipulability [131,135]. Certain probiotics have been reported to form robust biofilms in vitro and shown to attach to various host biofilm sites; these include L. casei, L. rhamnosus, L. plantarum, L. reuteri, L. acidophilus, B. bifidum, and B. breve [136][137][138][139][140][141].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be stressed, however, that these animals have a thinner epidermis and dermis compared to humans, thus bringing into question suitability of such an animal model. On the other hand, experiments on large animals, such as pigs, whose skin has been regarded as the closest surrogate to human skin with regard to similarities in structure and healing, have a disadvantage of extensive costs, handling, and lack of genetic manipulability [131,135]. Certain probiotics have been reported to form robust biofilms in vitro and shown to attach to various host biofilm sites; these include L. casei, L. rhamnosus, L. plantarum, L. reuteri, L. acidophilus, B. bifidum, and B. breve [136][137][138][139][140][141].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sterility in skin-injury repair has been viewed as an important factor in effective wound healing. However, maintaining a sterile wound-healing environment is a difficult prospect considering the exposure of most wounds to the environment (88). Recent evidence suggests that populating wounds with commensal microbes can reduce infections after surgery and minimize the need for antibiotic treatment (89).…”
Section: Wound Healingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commensals can also inhibit growth of pathogens and thus alter the inflammatory response. (For a comprehensive review of skin commensal immune and microbiological interactions see). One proposed suggestion to healing wounds has been the topical application of commensal bacteria.…”
Section: Parallel Mechanisms Between Gut‐brain‐axis and Skin‐brain Axismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inflammatory mediators are generated by multiple cell types within the wound, as the pathogen's microbial ligands activate ubiquitously expressed toll‐like receptors with downstream generation of innate immune responses . Inflammatory responses are marshalled from multiple cell types in response to bacterial ligands: mesenchymal stem cells increase IL‐6 generation, fibroblasts release TNF‐α, keratinocytes release IL‐6, TNF‐α and other pro‐inflammatory cytokines, and cells of the innate immune system exhibit a complex cross talk with the host microbiome to fine‐tune a multifaceted response (reviewed in References ).…”
Section: Parallel Mechanisms Between Gut‐brain‐axis and Skin‐brain Axismentioning
confidence: 99%